Welcome to Audit The Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens on police interaction conduct by liking and/or subscribing.
Officers often disguise informal requests as lawful orders and use fear tactics to justify their actions. This video offers advice on how to combat officer silence and unlawful orders.
Original video: https://bit.ly/2wDfAIP
Jeremy’s Channel: https://bit.ly/31dfANq
Policy video: https://bit.ly/2QNARbQ
Sources:
https://bit.ly/2Ik1Bgm
https://bit.ly/2q9hD2s
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complimentary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Like and subscribe for more police interaction content!
In the last 4 days I've watched about 50 hours of this channel. I've been watching it while at work. These videos have taught me how stupid law enforcement officers really are. Uneducated and stupid.
There are freedoms, but there is also decency and practicality. Asshole.
This “Aditor” is the shit side of the “freedom” that we all have.
He watched a YT vid and went there to mess with officers. Not educated. Not cool. That’s like blasting music in your neighborhood cause you can just to piss off neighbors cause it’s day time and you can. This dude is garbage.
Why so this fool laogjing at? He thinks it’s funny that his ignorance allowed the police to violate him and then he gave permission; giving up his right and thinking that he was being violated AFTER he loss his right by giving said permission. Moron auditor.
I don’t get why these cops keep approaching these first amendment auditors and have the nerve to say they are in fear. If they were truly in fear, they should sit from afar and watch the man or woman for a minute and see what their true intentions are because if their intentions are malicious once you show up on scene, they might backpedal then.
Seriously, A C+ ??? Overall YOU get an F at grading. That cop was a piece of 🗑️ and basically threatened a law abiding citizen. Didn’t you hear how he called him by his entire name? Do you think that was normal? Nooo, he was basically letting the man know. They know who he is. That was a clear threat.
It was however under threat of arrest.
K .. let’s not be silly. Our taxes are pooled and it all comes from the same pot. Done be silly.
In their defense:
Filming a car in public: not suspicious.
Legally carrying a gun: not suspicious
Both at the same time, though?
If he goes to the local store and buys a coke he has paid taxes in that municipality! Tax dollars from somewhere is paying for these cars.
Just because a cop is near you does not mean you have to disarm yourself as we have the 2 amendment right to bear arms to resist a tyrannical government
Why did you do that thomas?
👎
I think the guy doing the videoing is a fool. He is just trolling the police. Does not he have anything sensible to do, such as going to work?
Did he really just say if you were in your yard and I pulled up with a gun wouldn't you feel a little different yinZ do it all the time
I don't understand why auditors don't say " I'm here to make police accustomed to citizens presence armed or unarmed filming in an effort to bring attention to poor policing practices "
Not sure why you're laughing..
But dude you're playing a dangerous game..
Nothing about this situation is funny..
Why would you walk on police property with a handgun…
They already act crazy when we got phones
Why even play this kind of game..
People be looking for trouble…
You know, you always comment about how auditors shouldn't confront the officers about what is right and wrong during the incident and settle it in a court of law, but you you gave the auditor a lower grade because he was coerced into giving in to the police. He should have been given a higher grade because he did not escalate the situation but pretty much stood his ground.
5:00 wow the narrator sounds like he is on the side of police.
I don’t care if you’re green😅😅 say it all..
OFFICER: "Ahh, so you're one of those" (those irritating fuggers that actually knows the law).
This is a pretty bad Audit, making assumptions without any basis.
Shift commander gets a F! The black male was probably scared he might get shot if he didn’t obey these horrible officers
I'd be all in favour of citizens recording actual police work (traffic stops, etc) but so many of these 'audits' involve people deliberately doing these things, such as filming police stations, car parks, etc. to provoke a reaction and I am of the opinion that this is 'reality' tv without being reality.
I'm already laughing because the chubby cameraman has a firearm…you 'merkins and your weapons. Bang bang! It seems to me that his intent to carry the weapon within the boundary of a police building was to provoke a reaction for the sake of his online activity. Right about now I'll offer up a 'f*ck you' to that. Poke a bear and get bit or tiptoe past.
Just a few death threats to get him to comply not bad lol. Man America is such a messed up country.
They just corned him and threatened to kill him wow
If someone is gonna shoot people they aren't gonna announce their presence or wait to be surrounded. The cops reasoning at this point is false otherwise they would have this guy at gunpoint because they legit fear for their lives
"these days" 😂 Cops love that excuse.
"So just to be clear, this is private property?" – "You pay taxes here?" – "Yes" – "…put your gun up"
He wasn't operating under the misconception that cities operate as private entities as ATA suggested. He knew damned well it was a lie. That's why he didn't answer the clarification. Police aren't as misinformed as people claim, they just say what they will to get their way
The "alarming thing" is that she has a badge, a gun and an ego.
If they're so scared of the public maybe they should find another line of work.
He should not have allowed the officer to remove his weapon. Statistically you're more likely to be killed by a cop than a cop is to be killed by you.. So the guy should have asked the cops to disarm themselves if they wanted him to be disarmed. It's only fair.
The dik head told the pigs that he is a good samaritan and yet told the pigs his car was over the road what a dumb ares
2a = Citizens ability to be armed and form militias, and defend themselves.
Any gov entity = heavily regulated. No guarantee they're permitted to be armed.
The whole "you don't actually pay taxes in town X if you live in town Y" argument is such a misnomer. You probably also don't directly pay taxes for the roads in town X, but you still have all the same rights as someone who does. Plus, the way city, county, state and federal budgets are determined, chances are some tax money the citizen paid somewhere DID end up back at the other town's police force (or roads) due to the commingling of funds. The budgets are EVERYBODY'S tax dollars, not just this guy's, and therefore he can still say his tax dollars went to town X's services and be correct.
Meanwhile the same officers probably post online about how good guys with guns will stop bad guys with guns.
Unfortunately their egos lead them to believe they're the only good guys with guns.
The question is. “Is it lawful to open carry by citizens in this locational”. If it is within the law, why is he being intimidated and disarmed?
"How many cops it takes for a public photographer" – reminds me of the old school offensive jokes, "how many Polish (or any other ethnicity a racist feels is inferior) people does it take to screw in a lightbulb?" [answer 100, 99 to turn the house around and 1 to hold the bulb in place]
Why does he think it's funny or "crazy" if the cops follow him around but not if he follows them around or follows people around a library or post office or whatever else these frauditors audit? I wish more cops and employees of various businesses would do this to frauditors. Just hover around them and watch them closely all the time they are there, without engaging with them. That's one thing that seems to annoy them the most since they don't get the result/reaction they are looking for.
Thank You🟧
Couldn't the same argument be made to the Sergeant about someone rolling up on a person while wearing a gun? When cops roll up on someone, that person generally doesn't know the officers/deputies/troopers and definitely don't know their intentions.
Whatever happened to this narrator?????