Officers Detain Citizen Investigating Corruption – Everything Law and Order Blog

Download the NewsVoice app for FREE using this link: https://newsvoice.com/app/audittheaudit

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pg/audittheaudit1

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Audit the Audit 2: http://bit.ly/2CD2b6j

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com

Welcome to Audit The Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://bit.ly/2XUhJ0S

TwentyFive’s channel: https://bit.ly/2Ajp2qd

Sources:

Terry v. Ohio: https://bit.ly/2XSHZc5

Sandra Bland Act: https://bit.ly/2Ysdsky

Limitations of a Terry frisk: https://bit.ly/3cWzxwA

Investigatory detentions: https://bit.ly/3dRsMxz

source

35 thoughts on “Officers Detain Citizen Investigating Corruption”
  1. Again an abuse of authority. Terry v Ohio gave the police unreasonable authority to violate the public’s rights as they wish. If they didn’t see an actual crime then they believe what someone else has said. Then they need to let people go. Just the fact that just because they got a call doesn’t mean anything. Investigate first and then question.

  2. That cop in the video, from my perspective, seems to be more a bitchy karen than anything, considering karens tend to think that they are above the law, and have more rights than anyone else

  3. I hate it when officers assume people do this for a quick paycheck. “Go back to your mom’s basement” yeah get that man fired. He’s outright just unfit to be an officer

  4. How the heck does this officer get a C-? He's just intimidating someone for corrupt officials. This isn't even law enforcement. Someone called and that's reasonable suspicion enough? Get out of here.

  5. I wish these auditors would press the false police reports. Ask who reported and what did they report hold them accountable. Make the police be held accountable.

  6. Seriously?? C-??? All he did was escalate & treat this man like absolute TRASH & his last remark “go back to your moms basement” first time ever @AuditTheAudit gets its own F. The city pay you for this video?

  7. The first one I get cuz any father would not want his daughter to date at that young age but the way he did it was very bad your daughter is going to grow up to not let you its like for any Parents Two forbid they're daughter or son, any kid would do what you are telling not to do he could of done that in a different way instead of using his power as a cop

  8. Shaffer is literally such a egotistical maniac that he just couldn't even imagine someone doing something for the betterment of others, like how the hell could reporting a legitimate chemical spill be a pay check. Police earn their reputation every day because of stuff like this, maybe if policing was about helping others it would workout better.

  9. All of you cop haters forget that freedom of speech is legal 😂 if you’re complaining about the officers insult, just remember it’s protected under the first amendment. What’re you gonna do about it, complain some more! 😂😂😂

  10. Henrik Ibsen wrote a play once about a scientist who discovers that the water supply is contaminated. They responded in the play the same way these officers did: by trying to destroy him in every way possible. ("Enemy of the People," good play, recommend it.)

  11. when somebody says" Courts take these situations on a case-by-case basis" or even mentions "officer safety" the cops will get away with WHATEVER they did. and probably get a parade. and NOT the fun kind, like Gay Pride parades, the ones like they have in North Korea, where the crowd has to hold a salute while the oppressors march by

  12. the fact that the cops are actually laughing about THEIR source of water being possibly poisoned, speaks volumes of the disconnect from the public. He's not even worried about the prospect of dirty water, because that's a "them" problem, and they only solve "Us" problems

Leave a Reply