Pastor Rejects Officers Blocking Free Speech

1. Thank you for joining us! Any likes or sub would be sincerely appreciated. What do you think Pastor Durbin could have done better? Comment below.

2. This is disgusting behavior on behalf of the police and im a huge police supporter as well. But no one can silence a pastor

3. Durbin is a solid preacher and is very involved in abolition of abortion.

4. Not reading the law? Huh? Why not force the cop to read the Constitution? Then the cop could give him a Bible. See who can speed read the best.

5. F as in FIRED

6. Your initial point about Jeff was if he was DETAINED… which he was not…. do you even watch your videos before posting lmfao, horraful

7. You mispronounced Apologia

8. It would have been a circular conversation. It would be pointless. Never thought I would see a so-called pastor being a sovereign frauditor.

9. cops HATE when you read them the actual law, then they can't just make sh*t up

10. It is obvious they just don't care what the law says! They do what they want!

11. Do not agree with your grading. You are telling us to believe you over his lawyer from the city this is conducted in, your personal bias is easy to see especially after your multiple remarks on not showing the content of the protest. Not once did the officers inform him that he was incorrect on the law meaning they don’t know it or didn’t want to tell him, both are issues. The first cop literally tells him “Don’t give me the law”, which in any of your other videos you would claim to be an abuse of power, poor conduct and attitude, lack of transparency and accountability, inadequate training, and improper disclosure of information. Yet you gave this man the B grade. You are leaning people to believe he did something wrong with your multiple remarks on the content of his protest. This is an obvious case of police officers power tripping yet somehow you figured out a way to spin it

12. Ive only watched as far as "called 911 for a noise complaint." Jesus karen, calm down

13. Thank you for not revealing the content. Religious ijits are the worst users of the 1st amendment

14. do you ever revisit old videos?

15. This is why its not wise to allow a female officer any type of higher positon of authority.

16. I hope he goes to jail!

17. He is not a pastor! He is a narcissist!

18. He is a trouble maker. The cop should of detained him!

19. I know the law was read on here, but as you said it was 2017 could that have changed since this happened for obvious reasons? So in other words, he may have not been wrong at the time. Just need more information on if there was any changes to the law that you read

20. You cut the best part, where he commands he to repent of her lawless, thuggish behavior.

21. The pastor is quoting the ARS that ATA is quoting nonsense!

22. These piggies are just as ignorant as the ATA is! That's right they graduated from the ATA school of law enforcement for piggies!

23. Hey,
    just wanted to share the Gospel that all men need, the Bible says all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23) this means we all deserve death and separation from a perfect and holy God. But God did not leave us for dead, He sent His only begotten Son to die in yours and my place, so that anyone who believes in Him and repents of sin will be saved from separation from God, and have eternal life! I urge you please put your faith in Jesus Christ and follow Him, He promises to save all who cry out to Him and have a humble heart. We arent guaranteed another day so we must repent of sin and seek Him today while He may be found!

24. Sounds like Arizona needs to be sued for 4th amendment violations. State law doesn't crump the Constitution.

25. More people today fear the devil than they fear our God.

26. A-po-lo-GI-a… as in apologetics.

    Why did you leave out the part of the law where it required a reasonable suspicion and must be an actual, articulate crime. In order to be legally detained, a legal basis that a crime was, or will be committed must be present. This basis did not exist and the detainment was invalid, once the investigation occurred.

    In order to be in violation – by any reasonable standard – you need a sound measuring device. The burden of proof that a crime occurred is on the officer, not on the person contacted. Unless and until a sound meter showed that a crime was committed , no crime was actually committed.

27. He took out God out

28. Please, if you understand history police officers in America were created the second gate the black in the whites is the only reason why police even exist in our society, because they are obligated and feel like they in history history show that they created for racism to brutalize the American people in the 1960s for ever Reagan declare War on America

29. So why was there not done in investigation before the suspicion of razz so again? Did they have a device to make sure that they’re being loud a decimal device would’ve been useful in this circumstance think that you’re over exaggerating it, bro you big Homie, but you lack the fact that you were trying to twist the manipulation and I don’t like it anymore.

30. Stop it

31. So you’re saying, we have no more freedom

32. I would give Durbin a B or C. Use of a megaphone seems like enough for the police to have reasonable suspicion of a violation of the noise amplification ordinance (because most megaphones will exceed that noise level), even if they don't (yet) have a measured reading of its noise level. Only way to undercut that argument is if the entire ordinance is unconstitutional. Failing that, they have reason to get his full name and he failed to provide it. Police exercised discretion in not arresting him but he was virtually asking for it

Comments are closed.