Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Part One

Original video 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrZJMt7DIxI

Original video 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q88XSfOsn08

MLive’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@mlive

Articles-
https://bit.ly/46bPMTV
https://bit.ly/3xYoUKA
https://bit.ly/3XZr6Mf
https://bit.ly/3xSLCDP

Sources:

Bay City Ord. § 54-48- https://bit.ly/464w1gW

Bay City Ord. § 54-49- https://bit.ly/3LnXG2Z

Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.81- https://bit.ly/4bHEqIo

People v. Cameron- https://bit.ly/3W684S5

Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.82- https://bit.ly/3zHrhlm

M Crim JI 17.10 Definition of Dangerous Weapon- https://bit.ly/4bCFxZW

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire- https://bit.ly/3pqWcs5

Texas v. Johnson- https://bit.ly/3CRAe8K

Part Two

Original Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVluP9eC28o

Code Blue Cam’s Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@CodeBlueCam

Sources:

Court Records Case No. 2021FO000453)- https://bit.ly/49EstTa

Wis. Stat. § 943.15- https://bit.ly/42KfcGn

Wis. Stat. § 943.13- https://bit.ly/3wkTHA2

Wis. Stat. § 968.24- https://bit.ly/45J8Sic

U.S. v. Wilson- https://bit.ly/3TbugKl

U.S. v. Tilmon- https://bit.ly/48lZEdk

District of Columbia v. Wesby- https://bit.ly/425L5rf

UWS 18.10(7)- https://bit.ly/49d1aQ6

Wis. Stat. § 946.41- https://bit.ly/3oeJ128

Wis. Jury Instructions (Obstructing) – https://bit.ly/3WiheKD

Wis. Jury Instructions (False Information)- https://bit.ly/3wkUbpQ

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

36 thoughts on “Police Chief Gets Fired, Charged, Sued, and BANNED From Policing After This Stop!”
  1. Thank you for being here. I hope you're having an amazing day! Be sure to stick around and check out the second encounter we cover in this episode. Cheers!

  2. Both cops not interested in them kids story of what happened. They was already ready to defend the chief. First cop picking in his nails like I hope he finish telling this story. They didn’t believe them even though they got it on camera

  3. I'm disgusted by the way the female officer tried to twist up the teens' words and story to protect the off duty pig who started the interaction. 😮

  4. Saying that the second man's explanation is dubious is a little absurd. The fact that his wife is with him is meaningless. If he really had to walk the site to check drainage he could very well decide to do it when he was in the area.

    The only reason the cops stopped him after the first encounter is because he hurt their feelings. If he had just walked away that would have been the end of it. Everything that happened after that followed from that.

  5. Why were the cops in the construction zone and they have nothing to do with construction? They can walk around the outside like everybody else stay the hell out of the construction site. They have no reason to be in there protecting it or not. They can protect it from the outside dumb f*** cops. I'm only about a minute into this video and I freaking hate them cops already

  6. I'm wondering about this. Chief assaulting an 18-year-old rather you get fired disband whatever one question was this Chief carrying his firearm which could have escalated to a shooting? He should have been put in jail, not just disbarred retired. His retirement should be revoked. She go to work at Walmart or a flower shop flippenburg or someplace

  7. The kids said the cop was better than him know he's not no cop is better than you they're beneath you always their welfare check comes from your mom and dad's taxes and yours too if you work

  8. You can really tell how badly he wanted to escalate to violence when the guy said “I can insult you all I want” and the cop replied “go ahead, assault me”

  9. The process the cops use to establish testimony really disturbs me. She keeps asking this kid clarifying questions from entirely different parts of the timeline of events, and then demanding he clarify what happened first in what order, it's like she is trying to cause confusion. Why? Ask about the sequence of events, ask clarifying questions about each step in that sequence AS it is reached? Why keep jumping back and forth between different parts of the story and then interrupting him with interrogative questions about which things happened first when? It feels like a psychological tactic used by a confidence trickster trying to confuse the brain to distract it from their watch being stolen or something. Not only that, many of her questions were leading and loaded, casually including the word "poke" instead of jab, for instance. If he hadn't corrected her and had just nodded, would that become his official testimony? Repeatedly discussing on the part where he said he could hit the guy back, as if he was intending to or perhaps had done so. It's almost like gaslighting.

  10. Second story is literally Oops! All A-holes involved.
    That guy who got detained pissed me off because he felt entitled to walk tjrough a construction zone.

    Those cops are worse. They detained him b/c he hurt one of the cop's feelings? Threatened to arrest his son b/!c it would punish the entire family?

  11. The chief is the epitome of an old man yelling at the kids to get off his lawn!😂
    Ive seen this interaction several times, and it reminds me of when i was a kid getting yelled at to get off the lawn. I will not to be that guy.

    The second guy was kind of an ass but thats not a law.
    They told him to leave, he gave some story, that nobody believed, about inspection of the site. If that was bs, why wasn't the wife there? She was waiting on the other side of the fence.
    He turned to leave, as they instructed him at first, said a bad word then went hands on.

    Also, the wife should shut up and have his back.

    She probably talked him into not pushing for any justice because they threatened the son.

  12. The police chief only retired so he could keep his pension. I hope that’s what he used to pay the settlement…

  13. Although the chief is entirely in the wrong, and i'm glad he got owned … the guy in the pink shirt is a total bozo and should check his attitude

  14. What i love about WI is i can stand in my girlfriend's yard (im from england half black) and the local sheriff will drive round stop 15 feet away from me and eyeball fuck me for 7 mins as i smoke a cigarette

Comments are closed.