Prison interview: Carolyn Warmus discusses Betty Jeanne Solomon case – Everything Law and Order Blog

Carolyn Warmus, a then-25-year-old schoolteacher, was convicted of killing Betty Jeanne Solomon, the wife of her 40-year-old secret lover, Paul Solomon. She sat down for an interview in 2018. Warmus was released from prison in June 2019. UPDATES: https://bit.ly/3f69lCe

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

45 thoughts on “Prison interview: Carolyn Warmus discusses Betty Jeanne Solomon case”
  1. It almost sounds like Paul Solomon hand picked Carolyn Warmus because she was young, naive and fell head over heels for him. Honestly, with her background, a man like him would have never been good enough for her (she was a millionaire’s daughter, had the best of everything).

  2. WOW…The way they manipulate shit to get a conviction is WRONG!!! There’s SO many innocent people spending their lives in prison for crimes they didn’t commit. The movie on lifetime bout her makes her out to be absolutely NuTs!!! My? In the movie it tells that she called his new lover (Barbara) mom while they were in Puerto Rico together, and told her that he killed his wife shooting her 7 or 8Xs w/ a 25 caliber. Why wasn’t that mentioned in here? 🤔

  3. From the time frame alone. She couldn’t have done it.
    The husband had motive and tons of opportunity.
    And a glove that disappeared. Then resurfaced. Shame shame on the judge for allowing it in.

  4. Im gonna say Betty Jeaneane was murdered by both Carolyn and Paul and at the end no-one took the bait or responsibility for the murder because they hired a someone else to do the dirty work while they both were consummating their sexual relationship that night. He grew bored with her as a serial adulter and she was led on angry and deflated by his constant lies and deception for leaving her. Someone had to get convicted. They chose her because of the glove. Paul Solomon should be doing the same time as Carolyn regardless since they're wasn't enough DNA proof against either. He caused this to happen indirectly or plotted it himself or with her. Affairs are not worth it. Bottom line!

  5. Caroline may have evidence tested but after so many years it’s probably a waste. Caroline was set up, but once she let that creep Solomon convince her to buy a guy, it was game over. Complicit! Even though she was nieve, she was smart enough to know better. You don’t mess around with married men!

  6. The detectives body language is really off. Watch his eyes everything there is a question put to him. He closes his eyes everything. No a blink or a quick pause. He can not look the interviewer in the eyes. When she asks about the glove she says that's a pretty big mistake and he comes back with "it was an oversight"

  7. This case is crazy. I mean, what was going on in the wife's life. She was also having affairs and what about the daughter. The husband takes off with some chick to Porto Rico after his wife gets murdered…. That's sketch. And where did they find this gun seller person at… Fake phone bills… So weird.
    They need to start all over with this one…

  8. She's guilty for sure. She had means, motive, and opportunity. This segment here is obvious pro-Carolyn. But plenty of other true crime documentaries explain this case in a lot of detail and there's no doubt she killed the wife of her lover. She had an extensive history of clinging on to married/attached men and of stalking and harrasing them when they wanted to end things.

  9. Either he brilliantly set her up or they planned the murder together and he then set her up. Either way, a woman stupid enough to go out with a married man is chasing her own demise in the end and boy did she get hers!

  10. So when it comes to Carolyn their is no evidence to her only theories. But it comes to the husband or the potential gunman that sold her the gun there is evidence but it shouldn't be classed as evidence 😑 make it make sense. If Carolyn was actually the killer why would she kill your wife and not your new lover if your wife accepts and was ALSO having an affair and doesn't stop u from doing it 🤷🏾‍♀️ it makes no sense there was never any motive and notice how they never looked properly into their marriage

  11. Crazy how you can be put to jail with weak evidence. At least if they don't have a smoking gun, the verdict should be far less severe. Imagine if you're put to death without the ability to even exonerate yourself..

  12. I have never heard of such bullshit! They have no idea where the glove was for all
    Those years – it sure wasn’t under lock and key by the police. He really succeeded in setting her up and that judge… I would be embarrassed if I was him. He is a joke and obviously doesn’t understand the rules of evidence. He needs to resign and she deserves another trial. I’m so disappointed in the prosecutors, their witnesses and the judge. They didn’t even pretend to have a fair trial. She was railroaded!

  13. If i was convicted of a murder and I was guilty at some point i would tell the truth, i am older and would just spill the truth, i feel like she didn't do it, i feel like she is telling the truth, i feel like she is guilty

Leave a Reply