A pair of twins are in an SUV when it plunges off a cliff in Hawaii, killing one of them and injuring the other. Did Alexandria Duval intentionally kill her sister? Crime Watch Daily’s Ana Garcia investigates.

Check your local listings at http://crimewatchdaily.com/page/2015/06/03/when-its-on/

Subscribe to our YouTube page: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC69uYUqvx-vw4luuX7aHNLQ

Facebook: http://facebook.com/crimewatchdaily
Twitter: http://twitter.com/crimewatchdaily
Instagram: http://instagram.com/crimewatchdaily
Website: http://crimewatchdaily.com

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

28 thoughts on “Pt. 2: Woman Allegedly Murdered Twin in Cliff Crash – Crime Watch Daily with Chris Hansen”
  1. From what they was telling in the story about these twins they must have been some shitty people seems like nobody like them and for good reason that black dude just caught a blessing in disguise by them leaving him behind because if he was with them he would have been dead two💯

  2. So, the cop is saying that when they went to the hospital that Alexandria was pretty defensive towards the questions they asked and that she seemed “disconnected”, like yeah, I imagine losing your best friend just hours before can have that effect on you. Also, he seems critical of her reactions and her responses but at no point does he ever divulge exactly what questions they were asking or how exactly they were treating her. I know police officers are important and my dad is a retired lieutenant with the police department in my hometown, so I have a lot of respect for them generally. However, if the current climate in this country regarding police is not enough evidence for you that cops are not always fair, they are not always honest and they are not always respectable, then I don’t know what else would convince you but the cop in this interview certainly seems like he has a “story” to tell and he uses every opportunity to disparage Alexandria.
    He goes on to say that she had a blank look on her face, which is not uncommon for someone who is in shock , and then he follows that up by saying that he found her behavior bizarre and not normal but he seems to forget that NOTHING about this tragedy WAS normal. Again, like I said in my other comment, Alexandria might have acted maliciously or she might not have, but I find it incredible the way this police officer answers the reporters questions and how judgmental he comes across to me. I understand that they need to conduct an investigation but he seems to know very little about what someone’s potential state of mind might be or the emotional reaction they’d have following a tragedy and/or death of a loved one. Right off the bat it seems as if he’s already deemed her reaction not normal, her not answering questions as suspicious and it seems pretty clear that he thought her guilty straightaway. That kind of tunnel vision and quick jump to prove your preconceived notion of someone’s guilt, as a police officer I think those actions are extremely detrimental to successfully solving a case. You fit the theory to the evidence, you don’t interpret the evidence in order to fit your theory.

  3. These Crime Watch Daily videos are certainly entertaining to watch but I don’t necessarily put a lot of stock into them. There’s been multiple videos that have been proven to have shared wrong information or that have sensationalized stories using a false narrative. Their Morgan Ingram video is probably the best example of this.
    Like I said, they’re definitely entertaining but also not what I would consider hard hitting or professional journalism. For the most part, a journalist is supposed to remain unbiased to the best of their ability. They ask questions that are important and get to the heart of the matter at hand, not questions that are leading or are obviously asked to illicit a certain response. A perfect example of this is at 1:15 – the reporter is asking about Alexandria’s reaction and state of mind immediately following the accident and she seems incredulous that Alexandria’s behavior is not what the reporter deems acceptable. First of all, that reporter is not a doctor or a psychologist so I highly doubt that she is wholly familiar with all the possible reactions one might have during a situation like that. Second of all, the lady was just in a serious car accident where her fu€king car plunged over a goddamn cliff and her twin sister, her best friend, was dead in the car next to her. Now, I’m not a psychologist either but I’m going to go out on a limb and say that being stuck in your car, on jagged rocks, 5 feet from the ocean, at the bottom of a cliff with a dead person next to you could easily put you into shock. Additionally, this person next to her isn’t just anybody but, on the contrary, it’s the absolute closest person to her, the person that she has literally spent her WHOLE life with, her best friend and twin sister. Most sisters tend to have a strong bond but generally, in twins, this bond can be described as even deeper and, sometimes, all encompassing. I also have to think that, being identical twins, seeing your sister dead next to you might fu€k with your mind a little bit, of you know what I mean.
    But the reporter asking, “If she’s just been in an accident, wouldn’t she be asking where’s my sister?” shows that she already looks at the surviving twin in a negative light, as if the reporter has any real grasp on what an appropriate reaction to this horrifying accident would really be.
    Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not outright denying that there wasn’t any foul play here or that there weren’t nefarious intentions. However, I’m not saying that there were either rather I’m simply commenting on the fact that these videos provide shoddy investigations and I watch them for fun but not to gather real information about any given case. 🤷🏻‍♀️

  4. If the one twin was purposely trying to kill the other twin, after how close they were and almost to an obsessive degree, then this has some similarities to another twin case. Now, the similarities may be few but, in my opinion, they seem noteworthy. The other set of twins were absolutely attached at the hip and one was never without the other. It’s because of this very intimate and all encompassing relationship that they never seemed to mind that they didn’t have any other friends. When one started dating, the other was jealous and not because she wanted a boyfriend of her own, mind you, but rather because he was taking her sisters attention away from herself. They came to realize, all on their own, at somewhat of a young age, that their relationship with each other not only bordered on toxic but that they were also prohibiting each others growth and development. They seemed to think that in order for one of them to truly thrive then the other had to die. Eventually one of them did die at a relatively young age and the twin that lived really blossomed and became successful. So, no, in that case one didn’t kill the other but the oddity of their relationship and their self awareness of the situation makes me wonder if they would have eventually taken drastic measures.
    Also, don’t even get me started on Ursula & Sabina Eriksson… this set of twins had once been extremely close, but as adults they lived in different countries and led different lives with their own families and they lived fairly normal & boring lives, I might add. Well, when they finally did get together, now in their early 40’s, I’m not exaggerating when I say that sh!t hit the fan, then hit the air conditioner, then flew right out the goddamn window. Both of them appeared terribly disturbed and, before their week together was over, they’d both be hit by cars after purposely running onto the highway and one would be charged with murdering a stranger. Since being separated they’ve both gone back to being the people they were before their reunion. It was assumed that their actions were due to some kind of folie à deux and that made me wonder if that condition is any more common in twins then non-twins?

  5. This whole thing gives me the movie “White Chicks” vibes 😂😂 the girls look like the Wayans brothers as the girls and the boyfriends look like the wayans brothers in the beginning when they’re Cuban and Tate undercover 😂😂🤣🤣 ✋YES I love this movie it’s one of my favorites 😂😂🤣🤣

  6. There's no way this is murder, bs drama to the extreme. Can't imagine her being accused of anything but endagering the live of a passenger because of reckless driving or attempted murder while commiting suicide at the same time??

  7. I can not stand this interview the over acting exaggerated leading and flat out dumbest questions ever " yOu ReCoGnIzEd ThEm¿?" No it was another pair of twins on the wall of one of the twins homes. You can even see the cops gaffing and looking awkwardly around when she talks.

Leave a Reply