Did Daniel Underwood really accidentally shoot himself, or is there more to the story than his fiancée let on? Crime Watch Daily’s Melissa McCarty investigates.

Check your local listings at http://crimewatchdaily.com/page/2015/06/03/when-its-on/
Subscribe to our YouTube page: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC69uYUqvx-vw4luuX7aHNLQ
Facebook: http://facebook.com/crimewatchdaily
Twitter: http://twitter.com/crimewatchdaily
Instagram: http://instagram.com/crimewatchdaily
Website: http://crimewatchdaily.com

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

45 thoughts on “Pt. 3: Man’s Shooting Death Raises Questions About His Relationship – Crime Watch Daily”
  1. It doesn't matter what anyone thinks if she's missing. Hard to prosecute someone you can't find on basically heresay (he said/she said)–but yeah it does sound extremely likely she killed him. Condolences to the family.

  2. It all boils down to lazy police work. A righthanded man had gunshot residue on his left hand. The woman supposedly attempting to keep him from shooting himself has no residue ( she washed it off before her police interview probably) and is focused on getting his wallet after his death. Those were alarm bells clanging at a deaf system. If they bothered to really investigate, they could have seen the roommate as an accomplice because her account would have contradicted the evidence. Maybe then they could have ferreted out the truth from her instead of rushing to; it was a suicide, case closed.

  3. The question was asked whether the new information would spark further investigation. The answer is most likely not due a police department that can’t be bothered to search for the truth.

  4. Watching these shows, I have realised the cops are so stupid. No residue on her hands??? WELL, how about she washed them very well first before calling the cops. The police seem to help the killers go free. Crazy.

  5. Of course there's no GSR on her hands! It's a shotgun, there wouldn't be any on her hands unless it was semi-auto, which it wasn't! The only GSR would be coming out of the barrel, which means he was trying to push the barrel away from him! The GSR tests alone prove exactly what happened, how can forensic scientists and cops be so stupid? If he fired the shotgun, there would be no GSR on his hands. Unbelievable.

  6. Noone has asked her any questions in 10 yrs?!? Why not? I know case is closed but their is plenty of reason to reopen it ,with all these new accusations that has come to surface! Omg ,I cant believe this airhead got away with murder..I guess it doesnt take brains,obviously…lol

Leave a Reply