Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original videos:
Part 1:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fAx5OzOhks&t=1s
Part 2:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehPotfQfkek&
Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfAeU2AOS4U

The Battousai’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdiRpq3iPQqlicPX38G5AbQ

Sources:

South Dakota v. Opperman – http://bit.ly/3oMhu2k

Cardwell v. Lewis – http://bit.ly/2MCXke6

Texas Penal Code § 38.02 – http://bit.ly/3cJLl9a

Ohio Revised Code § 2921.29 – http://bit.ly/2LmHqDW

Stein v. New York – http://bit.ly/3joeckx

18 U.S. Code § 3144 – http://bit.ly/3jmrYEl

Federal Justice Statistics, 2016 – https://bit.ly/2OaSLYV

Louisiana Revised Statutes Tit. 15, § 257 – http://bit.ly/3tyAqVE

Gitlow v. New York – http://bit.ly/3azQ4Yw

State Action Requirement – http://bit.ly/36Hd4nd

Texas Penal Code § 30.05 – http://bit.ly/2LmJjk0

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

42 thoughts on “Sergeant DEFENDS Citizen From Corrupt Cops”
  1. Two clowns with badges and guns!
    Their family must be proud!

    Change that to three dummies!
    Walking cash dispensers…. Cash in Philip… not the locals fault but it is their problem.
    Until they clean it up…. Take their money dude!

  2. i can't keep watching these. i get so angry my mind goes into overdrive with revenge fantasies-not very healthy. reality is i respect police. they have a tough job so i do everything i can to comply whenever i get pulled over which, luckily, is very rare and is always my own fault. i've never encountered these kinds of cops. my advice if you get pulled over: roll down your windows, turn on interior lights if its dark outside, have license and insurance card ready. there is no good outcome by provoking the police.

  3. 1:52 – That's false, and the cop is right. So, all those "peeping Toms" who peep through windows can claim that too and be released. And all those photos that stalkers have when FBI gathers them, must be inadmissible too… total BS. No, rather, the officer is correct. Just because the car is in a public place, that car is considered someone's PRIVATE PROPERTY. YOU CANNOT TAKE PHOTOS OF INSIDE SOMEONE'S VEHICLE IF YOU ARE NOT AN AUTHORIZED COP WITH A WARRANT TO DO SO. ALL POLICE MUST HAVE SURVEILLANCE APPROVAL ANYWAY. SO, NO RANDOM CITIZEN CAN HARASS ANOTHER CITIZEN OR THREATEN THEIR RESIDENCE OR ANY FORM OF PRIVATE PROPERTIES BY TAKING PHOTOS OF WHAT MAY BE INSIDE THEIR VEHICLE. THAT'S LIKE SOMEONE TAKING PHOTOS OF INSIDE SOMEONE'S HOME, WITH A DRONE. THAT TOO, IS ILLEGAL. THAT'S HOW THEIVES "STAKEOUT". AND TO ALLOW SH* LIKE THAT, AND NOT ENFORCE BOUNDARIES LIKE THEY SHOULD, THEY NEED TO BE FIRED. SO THAT ONE COP WAS CORRECT. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PRY, STALK, STAKEOUT SOMEONE'S ELSE'S PROPERTIES WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION (AND THAT'S GIVEN ONLY TO AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUALS LIKE THE POLICE). PEOPLE NEED TO MIND THEIR BUSINESS UNLESS AN ACTUAL CRIME IS BEING COMMITTED. COME ON… THIS CONSTANT ABUSE OF POWER AND PEOPLE BEING NOSY AND OVERSTEPPING THEIR BOUNDARIES NEED TO STOP. MIND YOUR BUSINESS. IF AN ACTUAL CRIME OCCURS, THEN, YOU CAN SURVEILLANCE. BUT IF NO CRIME IS BEING DONE, WHY THE FCK WOULD YOU BE A NUISANCE/PEST TO EVERYONE? SO SICK OF SH*TTY TERD PEOPLE ALWAYS ABUSING CONCEPTS AND TWISTING SH* JUST TO PRY INTO OTHER PEOPLE'S BUSINESS WHEN NO CRIME IS BEING DONE. UNLESS SOMEONE IS ACTUALLY HARASSED BY THE POLICE, WELL, THAT'S NOT INSIDE A CAR, IS IT? TOTAL BS. PEOPLE NEED TO STOP ABUSING THEIR SO CALLED "FREEDOM". IT'S NOT CALLED EXERCISING YOUR RIGHTS IF IT'S AT THE EXPENSE OF TAKING ANOTHER PERSON'S RIGHT TO THOSE VERY SAME RIGHTS, AWAY. IF THAT GUY THINKS IT'S OKAY TO TAKE PHOTOS OF INSIDE SOMEONE ELSE'S CAR, THEN OTHER PEOPLE MIND AS WELL TAKE PHOTOS OF INSIDE HIS CAR AS WELL. ALL THE TIME. SEE HOW HE LIKES THAT SH*. PEOPLE NEVER THINK! THEY NEVER THINK UNTIL IT'S THEIR TURN! THEN, ALL OF A SUDDEN, THEY'RE THE VICTIM! COME ON! LYING, HYPOCRITICAL FREAKS!

  4. Wszyscy policjanci są tacy sami. Buta , arogancja , pokaz siły , kłamstwa , łamanie prawa . I w USA i w Polsce . Porażka .

  5. The Supreme Court has a little convicted. Anything to your eyes can see. You cannot trespass the eyes and this officer not knowing that it was as badge his gun. He certification to be a police officer. If you're that stupid, you don't need to be out in the street. Threatening people with your foolishness

  6. Fyi: for those who are curious what purple paint on trees or posts mean, yes, it means "keep out"
    In my 60+ years, I never knew this.

  7. Police officers just love ordering people about and it doesn't matter if it's one of their own they just love it anyway.

  8. These officers are definitely misguided and ill informed on the laws, but to describe them as "corrupt" is an unfair description. The definition of corrupt is defined as showing a willingness to be dishonest for personal gain. While there are certainly some corrupt officers, these misguided fools are not corrupt. Your title, while surely is getting your desired clicks, is more dishonest than these officers. Maybe you should audit yourself as well in all fairness.

  9. The stupidity is overwhelming with these idiot cops, i can't believe they actually graduated from high school, how does that happen and they end up so stupid

  10. Just to be a human in usa, is a crime……everybody of all cops press the people to any crime, just to handcoff them….idiots. do the get paid pr person they arrests? Its looks so.

  11. Of course the Sgt is going to side with the Thin Blue Line Gang of Jack Boot Thug Club of Tyrant Cops & he’s as ignorant as his deputies but WTF can we expect of these low IQ Deputies when they’re following these un-informed superiors!

  12. These cops are still totally ignorant of citizen’s rights in 2023-24 & one would think that they’d have training by now as to the basic Constitutional Rights of all Americans or in fact anyone on American soil who is accused of a crime!
    Just listen to this idiot cop his idiot partner threatening arrest of a citizen for filming a crime scene or whatever the F this scene is! These cops think they know the law but they’re totally ignorant or they do know the difference & are simply lying to get their way b/c this camera man doesn’t bow down & lick their fn thin blue line jack boots!

Comments are closed.