Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvWmj_YgAuE
Police State: New Jersey’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr7p9ZvcS4X9yPWWwEOra7A
Sources:
N.J. Stat. § 2C:29-1- https://bit.ly/39QAuHG
State v. Crawley- https://bit.ly/3CW36Ms
State v. Williams- https://bit.ly/2ZvXzO4
Bryant v. Camden County Police Department- https://bit.ly/3ov8PVF
Brown v. Texas- https://bit.ly/3p1SKDr
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada- https://bit.ly/3nYdxIV
United States v. Sokolow- https://bit.ly/3CSabxu
N.J. Stat. § 2C:29-3- https://bit.ly/3m0N4tC
Hindering Model Jury Instructions- https://bit.ly/3CWCtXw
State v. Aad- https://bit.ly/3APGv3y
Article- https://bit.ly/3lQZxQw
It goes without saying that Sergeant Ruiz gets an A+ here! Check out my second channel for more content: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
butt hurt!!!!! i didnt get my way 🤣
The officer in this video didn't seem too out of line. For the most part he was relatively courteous and professional. His problem was he was very poorly educated on the laws he was supposed to enforce which could be a problem with his ability to learn or more likely poor training provided by his department.
118.000 dollars? Are you fcking kidding me?
OK right off the bat the narrator is wrong. No individual has to give up the fourth amendment rights and show ID unless they are being charged or under arrest for a crime. They committed suspicion is not a crime. I have seen the update on this video that officer was terminated from his position
Sometimes I feel bad for these dudes. They start off right but the ego takes over and makes them do wrong lol
He gets an M for being a MORON!!
No question the Sergeant gets an A+. HE understood the law, defused the situation, and respected this gentleman's civil rights… That POS Gestapo cop should be fired! Not only is he ignorant of the law, he's an arrogant prick. He was so damn cocky and sure of himself, and even when corrected, acted like he was still right. He's dangerous.
Judges nationwide need to start throwing out obstruction charges Police are charging it when they don't have a crime and most are spiteful over people using there rights and just use the frivolous charge
Ver ahr yhour paperssssss?
I can watch this a million times over. Dumb, cocky, no-it-all cops are horrible!!!!
If the person is not in trouble for anything at all, what point does it serve in identifying who they are??? It had been established from the start by the cop's own words that a proper investigation was not required as that person wasn't committing an offense, yet the cop still tried to instigate the steps towards identifying them….for what? Even if the cop did get the guy's name, what exactly is he going to do with that other than be able to say that specific person was not committing a crime that day? It seems to me that whenever cops do this, they're fishing for a crime to investigate because they feel as though their suspicions are always warranted, even if said-suspicions are just "I don't like what this person is doing".
Must have been a slow day for crime.
This is an example of an "auditor" that's wants cops to harass him when he's out filming. He makes no attempts to clearly explain himself and is argumentative because he hopes the cop does something illegal so he can get views on his video and file a lawsuit. He could just tell the cop exactly what he's doing right up front- that he's an "auditor" and is out there filming so that a cop will respond and he can post video of the interaction, but that would lessen the chance of a hostile interaction, so he doesn't.
Stupid cop that thinks he's actually in charge.
"STOP and ID" = "Papers Please". Seems our History books touched on something like that!!!
"Do you have I.D.?" "Bout what?"
What makes me so mad, is these cops are literally OUT LOOKING FOR TROUBLE… So much so, that they are willing to trap you in a crime because they need something to stick.. Its so awful, i feel bad for people out there just living there life and some cop wants to be a hero.
I like to believe that, since the Sergeant showed great ability to carry out his duties, that he would ensure his officer was appropriately disciplined for this affront. Though it seems like the officer escaped being fired or suspended, is hope the sergeant is as good as he seems, and found other ways to reprimand the officer.
This is what happened to the dumb kids from high school who wrestled in high school…..they become cops like this guy.
if there was just one moment of space in the ego exchange…notice how fast, precise, and lack of space there is. fascinating
Love how so many cops are using the "we got a call" excuse to try to get around our constitutional rights. They want to pretend that in the name of public interest they can demand things otherwise disallowed. These, usually anonymous, complaints are 'hearsay'. at best.
Good work bro ❤
Sometimes these auditors just get needlessly snarky though. I understand that in order to audit responses they have to push the issue, but sometimes i think they do so in a way to purposely try to incite a response so they get more views.
I’m 60 years old. A grandmother. I can’t believe I just caught myself sticking my tongue out at the first officer when his superior set him straight. It really felt good tho. Lol.
Such a disappointment that this unconstitutional law exists 2:44
90% of officers need retraining.
Yes this ended well but its very clear that all the current issues that these excellent and greatly needed audits identify surely these must be addressed seriously as ongoing education, if not daily to ensure all officers who swear an oath to serve the people they need constant education on the job and these challenges to peoples rights would disappear. It must be a lot of pressure for officers of any rank to be in law enforcement its a high stress situation but if the powers that be in the industry are genuine they will take this onboard and protect all the rights of the people otherwise you just have communism very quickly, I know because here is Australia the corruption is broard and deep and our constitution has no authority against the judicial/police system. I so greatly admire America and Americans you are so blessed to have a constitution that protects you.
It’s astonishing how many law enforcement officers are not aware of the statutes and rights of the population. The people training these officers need to do a better job of ensuring their officers have retained the training curriculum. We should always acknowledged all the amazing law enforcement officers doing a great job out there!
I've watched a number of these videos, and it's clear that police across the country are in serious need of better training. It's scary that so many "law enforcement" have no idea what they are doing, and it's a very important job to be accurately informed for. How can a man make over 100,000 dollars a year, and not know basic constitutionally protected rights?
Hes just making shit up
New Jersey cops have a IQ of about 41
Something turns into something. 🤦🏿
Yeah… I bet he went to one if those "training conventions* that twll cops to break the law. The ones that New Jersey Public Safety biss said were causing the State to have to retrain EVERY cop in rhe State .. lol
That family needs to do something about that
Im so sick of hearing cops tell the same bs
This is the biggest lie ever suspicious person
How man times did he get away with these multiple infractions. Trying to dispute a superior is standard.
American laws are so stupid and not consistent.
Where in the span of our history have we heard this phrase before?" Show me your documents.!"
"I'm charging this pretend officer with violating my civil rights with malicious intent, and criminal harassment. Cuff him or your department will get racketeering charges, the settlement check will include making you sell your cars and having to ride those Old A$$ crown vics because of how broke the city's gonna be."