Taylor Schabusiness’ defense attorney asked the jury to keep an open mind and not jump to conclusions when they hear the facts of the horrifying crime. “Access the credibility of each and every witness,” Christopher Froelich said during his opening statement. Schabusiness is on trial for the beheading of her lover, Shad Thyrion.

#TaylorSchabusiness #Wisconsin #LawAndCrime

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

39 thoughts on “Taylor Schabusiness’ Lawyer Asks Jury To Keep An Open Mind While Learning About Horrifying Murder”
  1. How do you defend a guilty client and tell jurors to keep an open mind. She killed that man and left his head in a bucket in his mother’s basement for her to find. She’s a despicable person.

  2. In the dictatorship of the proletariat, we would not be going to trial. This blind rule of law thing is absolutely a feature of our government that protects criminals, particularly aristocratic people.

  3. This is absolutely ridiculous due to the simple fact that she was the only one in the room downstairs with the victim, as well as all of her fingerprints on the murder weapon and the DNA and her confession. What more do you need to prove who did it! So the question is why they do it. And has she killed before?

  4. I always find it interesting when the defendant opens their statement with burden of Truth and so on to me it just sounds like they really don't have much to say because they know that this is a sick twisted individual who did the crimes and from my understanding she also made statements that she did it correct me if I'm wrong

  5. But she’s admitted she did it? Why got through a trial to establish guilt/innocence? Just go to sentencing where it’s either prison or institution.
    They’ve obviously drugged her following her previous attack in defence attorney

  6. I understand innocent until proven guilty and it's a lawyer's job to defend someone and try to get the best possible outcome for them but I feel in certain cases they should just be there to make sure the person isn't charged with things someone else did. What I mean is if they didn't act alone in the horrible acts, they just get charged with what they did

Leave a Reply