[DON’T MISS TONIGHT’S LIVE VIDEO – 7/12: https://youtu.be/8wYrt6mwOok ] Join me live for discussion with me, John H. Bryan, West Virginia Civil Rights Lawyer, for discussion on our Family Court Judge Search case, now in the news, and other civil rights law topics, in Freedom is Scary, Episode No. 17. Have questions? Post them up. In this video, hear about the judge search case from the horse’s mouth, as my client, Matt Gibson, joins us live and describes what happened. Also, my first Karen incident…..

UPDATES AS OF 10/7: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/2020/10/06/continued-fallout-from-the-family-court-judge-search-case/

thecivilrightslawyer.com

Join me next Monday evening, October 12, at 6:30 pm eastern, for the next Freedom is Scary live – with a special guest out of this very same county, who you will want to hear about. Trust me.

Family Court Judge Search Video – Part 2: https://youtu.be/V-2o0PVLQtk
Family Court Judge Search Video – Part 1: https://youtu.be/_0IDL8ll2x4

My analysis on the Statement of Charges against the judge discussed in the video: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/2020/10/03/wv-supreme-court-releases-formal-statement-of-charges-against-raleigh-county-family-court-judge/

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

34 thoughts on “The Judge Search Case and Civil Rights Law Discussions – FIS Ep. 17”
  1. You got to look at the police department just like as if it is a mafia everything they do is for profit no matter what they do or who they hurt it's all for profit prove me wrong

  2. probably the reason the lawyers in the family court system, where this judge was presiding, did not make any objections is because they have to work with this judge all the time and they don't want to make an enemy out of them.

  3. 5th circuit and most circuit court have recognized that it is a constitutional right to film the police in public.

  4. The juries do not balance the judges the judges when he has a pal come before him as a litigant with lawyers volleys the case I object sustained I object sustained I object sustained and then the other side of the opposing side I object overruled I object overruled objection overruled and the only thing that's left is a peel and then you got to walk through the gauntlet for the appeal it is a really amazing that we have established this this horrific system based on Ten Commandments but then again the police the sheriff judges and lawyers swear an oath the military swear is it oh that disobeys it never read it never read it but the judge bounces the case the where he wants it the judge instructs the jury to disregard the judge instructs the jury to this to that juries need to understand jury nullification the simple thing the judge can only make better if a case is simple and the guys absolutely Innocent but the jury finds him guilty the judge skin say no you're wrong he's innocent are they could say life in that he could say no we're not going to give life we're going to get in 20 years judges in South Carolina while the whole system is all together it's the state not not Raleigh County it's the whole state of South Carolina Judiciary is corrupt incompetent mostly like when I demanded many many many times for my lawyer to get evidence from the police he refused didn't do it didn't do it they already had the case decided they already knew they already knew I didn't do it but they needed the money and the lawyer was in on it and the police never did turn over the evidence to the solicitor which is the law and it was not in the discovery package the second or third meeting with the attorney the attorney gave me the discovery package here take a look at that here take a look at that what the hell for what the hell for why is my attorney giving me the discovery package believe me if you are in and around Pickens County or Greenville County and something happens go to North Carolina or Georgia to get your attorney do not use the attorneys in this area

  5. I don't know why you don't understand why the lawyers complied lawyers do not work for the clients the lawyers work for themselves and their reputations and political ends making friends with the judge they don't want to create any friction with the judge with the court they need favors later on it's not about the law it's about favors friendship good old boy Etc Pickens County Greenville County South Carolina the lawyers the judges the police all work together to take money from the innocent it's what they do it's what they did to me

  6. And what about the sheriff's that went with her in violation of the law and also the bailiff who stole stole theft under color of law his chainsaw qualified immunity my butt

  7. Judge should be disbarred and prosecuted. Sounds like the judge and attorneys had a scheme to extort money from defendants using the threat of jail time for those who refuse to play along. This is mafia shit. Surprised someone hasn’t used violence to stop this corrupt judge.

  8. shows how you can even be a law enforcement officer and the system turns against you that fast judges and the sheriffs which is there own they are doing this to and how us citizens are going through this everyday

  9. It is the opinion of the Supreme Court that Judges are appointed by God and therefore entitled to absolute immunity for all civil liability committed within the scope of their employment.

  10. Wow, the power trip this judge is on.. she should be removed immediately, along with officers involved. This is an outrageous abuse of power .. they need to make an example of her …😡

  11. Were the judge and the deputy AND everyone that came into his home charged with all the felonies they committed? Aggravated extortion (making terrorist threats) and evidence tampering and destruction (his recordings, on HIS PROPERTY)…..felony home invasion, with no warrant, or probable cause of a crime, violating decided court orders, armed robbery and treason of the 1st, 4th and 5th, at the minimum?
    NO family court has inherent authority in law, they are all by agreement….
    Doing anything under terrorist threat, duress and coercion, IS NOT consentual.

    And who can make a law that in a court for a matter in the public. YOU cannot record for YOUR evidence in any PUBLIC COURT. THAT is evidence tampering and treasonous also.
    ANY immunity for treason and serious felonies is treasonous bullshit…..And makes them not sworn servants, but the tyrant King of England, that we revolted and formed America over…..

    A "SWORN PUBLIC SERVANT" CANNOT have immunity by definition and THEIR "SWORN" duty…Even the claim is ridiculous. THEY ARE NOT the sovereign, WE ARE.

    Not upholding a sworn oath is called TREASON…..18 USC 2381…..and each charge carries 5 years to a death sentence penalty. It used to be 10 years to death, but was reduced under Obama for some odd reason?

    Yeah, they are lucky they did not run into this 2 decade combat veteran, that was in biological warfare safety for 10 years….. good ole boy.
    I'm not polite to freedom hating unamerican retards AND have no obligation to be.

    For a member of the BAR, I like you…But the BAR is still a treasonous racket that has unlawfully monopolized OUR LAW.

  12. The Judicial "system" (Judges, Prosecutors & Police) ignoring law & proper procedures occurs nationwide far too often, while that same "system" professes to enforcing law. Humans are simply not as far from the cave as they think they are. Police need to be the BLUE LINE that tells those they serve NO, when an improper or illegal order is given (and they don't) because they serve each other.

  13. Blind Justice seems to be needing a civil rights lawyer I don't know what the deal is with him but he said he was looking for a lawyer

  14. As a person who has been through the judicial system, sometimes its better going to jail than submitting. Especially when you know you will win in the end.

  15. I would if I was his attorney, file a federal lawsuit for violating his civil rights under the Federal Constitution. In that process I would strip that judge of all her protections under the law . She was not performing her duties under the law therefore she should not be protected. The bailiff should have known better and refused the unlawful order. I know for a fact I would have.

  16. An old gent, Marine veteran of WWIi Guadalcanal, Iwo Jima, and friend had been married and divorced 4 times. He told John, when you get divorced your soon to be ex has three attorneys in the room. Her attorney, your attorney and the judge. My experience with two divorces, affirmed what he said. He also said I loved them when we got married and loved them more when we divorced.

  17. John great content but your delivery needs to be more concise and straight forward… 17 mins into the video before you get to the point………

Comments are closed.