The Wrong Way To Audit – Everything Law and Order Blog

Welcome to Audit The Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

source

25 thoughts on “The Wrong Way To Audit”
  1. I think it’s funny how you hid the identification of the auditor because you said he didn’t display proper etiquette, but if it was a law-enforcement officer not displaying proper etiquette, your channel would be the first to expose him.

  2. My biggest issue with the auditing community is when they go someplace they have no business being in but are (mostly) legally able to be at simply to cause a scene and attempt to catch law enforcement off guard. Not for the purpose of accountability, but for clout chasing. I remember an incident about a year ago were my local county had a guy go into the county building and start filming people. Not illegal mind you, but again the guy had no real business being there. One of the ladies who worked their asked him to stop, he refused, the Sheriffs office was called and the guy and a female deputy got into an argument in which both were in the wrong. The femlae deputy needed to brush up on the law and her mannerisms but the guy (mind you he posted this on youtube so we got to see his side of the story) was hostile and beligerent from the start and led office the interaction with insulting the deputy. She called her super, he came out smoothed things over and the guy left.

    A few days later he posted the video on youtube, the Sheriffs office and the county building got tons of phone calls of often hostile people, many of which were making death threats (btw, that is NOT protected by the first amendment) they also posted the home address of the county lady who asked the guy to stop filming and the female deputy. Mind you, that deputy was a single mother of a less than sixth month year old daughter and fans of this guy were posting her home address online and joking about going to her home and killing her.

    You may be legally within the right, but not always morally. And when you go somewhere with the intent of causing trouble you should bare in mind the effects of your actions. That little incident didnt convince my small town of the value of first amendment auditors, all it did was tell us that they were ok with their supporters threatening to kill a single mom.

  3. Unfortunately many auditors are becoming the tyrants that they claim they are exposing and they will be the cause of more laws and restrictions that will be well within the rights of lawmakers and probably will be supported by constituents of those lawmakers. You cannot call yourself an auditor and treat good cops like they are not even human. If you want to see how to conduct yourself watch the father and son auditors I won't mention their names but they each have their own channel

  4. Awesome analogy! I saw one at a library that I just thought was disgusting, harassing ordinary people to get them to call police. Just a gross and dangerous way to try to make money.

  5. Liberty doesn't stop at a private property threshold.

    See Woolworths case law and 18usc241.

    There are no exemptions under 241 for private property.

    As a matter of fact… 241 was created to prevent and punish anyone anywhere who conspiracies to violate any federal or state constitutional right.

    This is my impression and knowledge of 241 and the history of the statue

  6. You understand these people are your fault right? Like you've caused all of these asshats to harass literally thousands of people and caused millions of dollars to be funneled into the court system.

  7. Cowardly video by this channel. You are quick to call out and identify police officers as you see fit. The lack of reciprocal treatment for auditors shows your bias. You can’t project to be above the fray such that you assign grades and call out whom you see fit yet provide unequal treatment.

  8. I can see it both ways, even in this video. First, if someone is recording from a public location, even if they are recording a private business, you can't judge the process by the quality of the outcome. That means that if his recording saved a life then it was good, but if it made a bad situation worse then it was bad. That is NOT how life works. Second, I think the auditor had a point in his concern before leaving. Perhaps he didn't phrase it in the most effective way, but perhaps he was trying to make sure the officer kept him safe from the autistic civilian who was clearly upset with him. Third, you can't qualify constitutional rights. You either have them or you don't. Not every police encounter is handled well, yet we still have policing. This video gave the impression that auditing that involves private property is somehow "less" than if it were public property. That is not an effective premise. If your point was any audit could be done better… well, no duh.

Leave a Reply