Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YWex-YJOts

KDJPRO’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCC0APdHOSPIPcIW3blFMhUQ

Mr. Everman’s GoFundMe: https://gofund.me/8e667ec9

Sources:

Okla. Stat. §21-1363- https://bit.ly/2TtcV2X

Cohen v. California- https://bit.ly/2OMM14a

Houston v. Hill- https://bit.ly/36hULEM

Terminiello v. Chicago- https://bit.ly/3rORi90

42 U.S.C. §1983- https://bit.ly/3aYfEYO

District of Columbia v. Wesby- https://bit.ly/3fQASJ3

Kansas v. Glover- https://bit.ly/2RMglNW

Juricich v. County of San Mateo- https://bit.ly/34se0u5

Okla. Stat. §21-1378- https://bit.ly/3p7BoXh

Okla. Stat. §21-649- https://bit.ly/2TmIf3f

Okla. Stat. §21-641- https://bit.ly/3fZ46FQ

United States v. Mitchell- https://bit.ly/3wIjfC4

Okla. Stat. §21-1290.26- https://bit.ly/3fPZ3HG

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 571.225- https://bit.ly/3fvHo9b

Update video: https://bit.ly/2ToEydj

Follow-up interview- https://bit.ly/3wIjtsU

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

26 thoughts on “They Were Falsely Arrested TWICE at the Same Stop”
  1. The couple was probably fighting about why she was going so slow before they got pulled over, which is why both of them knew exactly what speed she was going!😂😂😂

  2. Dude had a gun on him in the back of a cruiser lmao cop was so flustered and sad he forgot to pat the dude down before cuffing him 😂 voice cracking and throwing a hissy fit.

  3. You can't make this shit up oh but the cop did this is fucking hilarious 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😮😮😮😮😮😮😅😅😅😅😮😮😢🎉😂😂😂🎉😢😢😮😮😮😅😅😅😮😮😢🎉😂😂🎉🎉😢😮😮😅

  4. You challenge their authority and you’re disorderly. You don’t answer their questions and you’re obstructing. Absolutely bananas.

  5. Well that cop didnt give him the chance to disclose that he had a gun, that was bullshit. Especially for that cop to threaten him to have his ccw license revoked.

  6. Wow, "I'm afraid you beat your wife!" Then claims he threatened him. Even if that was a dumb thing to say, or a hard truth for that cop to hear. I dont thinknthat cop should be wearing his feefee's on his sleeve, or else he's gonna be having a bad time trying to enforce the law

  7. I think this officer is suffering a controlled panic attack or mental breakdown. He is not fight to hold power over anyone.

  8. Regardless of the charges being dropped he should still go after them legally. I know nothing at all will happen to the man child of a cop, but at least this man can be compensated for this egregious disregard of someone’s constitutional rights

Comments are closed.