Pick up your copy of The Civilian Rights Handguide here: https://a.co/d/aDvE0xL
Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf_s7IZpKlE&t=1003s
Body camera footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJBJq4DTcwU
Kansas City Accountability’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@kansascityaccountability9515
Sources:
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 84.710- https://bit.ly/3DEHZPf
Grandview Code of Ord. § 34-25- https://bit.ly/418JELN
Grandview Code of Ord. § 34-26- https://bit.ly/4eXT3Jt
Hinesley v. City of Lake Ozark- https://bit.ly/49iVlkR
Brown v. Texas- https://bit.ly/3p1SKDr
Chestnut v. Wallace- https://bit.ly/4bsErjI
Turner v. Driver- https://bit.ly/44Vw4Kg
Miranda v. Arizona- https://bit.ly/3xGP9yR
Pennsylvania v. Muniz- https://bit.ly/3ThBX16
Pick up your copy of The Civilian Rights Handguide here: https://a.co/d/aDvE0xL
If you want to know more about this book check out my video about it on my second channel: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lktCOSK5bb4
Thanks for all your support! I hope you have a great Monday and a fantastic week!
somebody's about to get paid
Lackluster opps you gorget Turner v Driver he was filming a police station.
Law enforcement hairstyles must be an inside joke among barbers.
You're slipping ATA ….
A 'C' for a false arrest !?
I'm so freaking confused 🙃
I'd like to go out there as what I am – an American State National- and see what they do. No camera, nothing but me.
Another video proves we have way to many cops on the payroll.
One thing you have to remember is cops lie and 17 year on the job lie alot.
That’s an extremely generous “C.”
Police get a f and the auditor should get a A next time don't talk to them
This is why you never say no. Always envoke 5th and ask for a lawyer. Then shut up.
“I’d rather roll a joint than case one” ayyyyy
Please explain how the crap they get a C, i guess its ok for you and absolutely fine when officers kidnapped lawful citizens unlawfully. You give the victims a B.
Acting suspiciously is not reasonable suspicion. This is what get cops confused. Terry vs Ohio is not cops detaining based on suspicion alone those officers had reasonable suspicion. They could articulate with FACTS why they suspected those men were more likely than not committing a crime.
If all you have is suspicion in and of itself that's a fricken hunch and NOT RAS. The job of the officer is to use an anlogee that simple to grasp is to paint a picture with facts. The more facts you have the more detailed the picture you can paint. This does not mean the picture painted is correct though.
Consider a call coming in some breaking into a car. Cop comes up and sees suspect using a slim Jim a known tool used to break into cars in the hand of the suspect. He then witnesses the suspect use said tool. The officer has more than enough facts to paint a picture that this dudes stealing a car. However, if it turns out the dude owned the property and the car he's not guilty of a crime! Due to the fact the officer has RAS he's well within his rights to detain.
In this situation these cops have No RAS. What's worse is these cops interfered with a journalist gathering content for a story a felony called prior restraint. I would purse a conviction thus stripping these officers of there ability to be officers. Do this a few times and cops will learn real fast what RAS means
Idk how i feel about general information that could save people lives being gatekeeped 😛
Those ordances are unconstitutional.
I remember the old Flex Your Rights videos which absolutely saved my ass from an illegal search and seizure. PD still searched and seized but their originally asking me if they could before doing it anyways resulted in charges being dropped.
This information is invaluable.
C for an unlawful arrest? This channel's grading has been getting worse.
"All you had to do was tell me your name". then that really calls into question the integrity and focus of the investigation.
Officer you are violating his 4th amendment rights. His also has 5th amendment rights.
IS THIS EMPTY HEAD SERIOUS….17 YEARS OFF GETTING IT WRONG LETS LOOK AT HIS AREST RECORD
They were not even close to use any authority. Yep unsubcribing
How is arresting someone for no reason a passing grade C?
All he had to do was be honest with the police that he was auditing and making videos for his youtube channel. He was vague and that makes it suspicious. He will lose a lawsuit and no lawyer will take it up. Be honest if you are auditing…..these fraudsters are trying to make money in lawsuits.
23:56 a "C" – after a false arrest, how about an "F" – geese
If a sea grade is passing. Audit the audit approves of an illegal arrest. Bootlicker audit the audit FAILS
So.. How do you know when you are legally required to give ID…? It seems absolutely innocuous.. They don't have to tell you what their reasonable suspicion is, so the fail safe is to just allow your 4th amendment to be violated.
Pig 🐽🐽🐽🐽
A c……
Arrest all Teslas now!
Police mentality: ohh oh, n****r with a camera – he might be casing the joint.
Wow again! They are so convinced the taxpayers are stupid.
Why are "Handcuffs" round and wrists are oval? The reason is why we have Audit The Audit.
bailey should not be in public. what a BS'er
Biggest idiot ever!!!
They should teach the information in your books in public schools!