Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUgE43htV7g
AssessorAudit’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@assessoraudit
Sources:
Articles-
https://bit.ly/3ClULqi
https://bit.ly/4fmqsOS
https://bit.ly/48Ic9lf
https://bit.ly/3YIKiwv
https://bit.ly/4fjhAJR
N.Y. Penal Law § 195.05- https://bit.ly/3uuI0pj
N.Y. Penal Law § 240.20- https://bit.ly/3WHktfo
N.Y. Penal Law § 140.05- https://bit.ly/4dYPDpm
N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 140.50- https://bit.ly/47r7P8q
Williams v. the City of Mount Vernon- https://bit.ly/3R0pgFZ
Devenpeck v. Alford- https://bit.ly/3CIQc5g
N.Y. Pub. Off. Law § 103- https://bit.ly/4fo7qaN
N.Y. Pub. Off. Law §105- https://bit.ly/3YC39Jy
N.Y. Pub. Off. Law §106- https://bit.ly/3YFZkmV
Devine v. Village of Port Jefferson- https://bit.ly/40FVEEc
Acosta v. City of Costa Mesa- https://bit.ly/3ArBYtd
Thanks for being here! I hope you have an awesome week! I have a huge announcement coming soon so be sure to check back over the next couple of episodes. I might announce it a little early on the second channel if you want to go check that out! See you in the next one. Cheers!
7
½male thug cannon
That clown thinks the town is his. He needs some investigation.
Well my mom said don’t call people stupid,try and see the situation from their point. The two female cops are STUPID
The level of ignorance and stupidity in law enforcement is beyond comprehension. I can’t think of any other industry where a lack of accountability and knowledge is rewarded.
Whilst constitutional rights exist, the reason why this policr operation continued is not because the police love council members, it's because America (seperateto all other democratic countries) does in fact work off personal views, feelings etc.even your own judges show personal judgements (mostly bad but sometimes even biased good) towards the accused!
This is NOT the same elsewhere!
A judge cannot show personal favoritism or penalty towards anyone. Rather they can only stick to the law, as stated in a law book.
Yes police may arrest innocent people (mainly due to ignorance of the law). But they can't make up personal laws! Just like a judge can't either.
I've watched MANY police interactions (and court judgements) in America. Suffice to say there is a clear and obvious personal bias ONLY in America.
I have my reasons for this broken jurisdiction and feeling enforcement, hower I'm unable to quote my most probable unsubstantiated claims by at least 50% of Americans, of which is a shame.
Why are public servants so interested in violating our rights and dishonoring their oaths? I just don't get it. These videos make the entire government seem like puppets controlled by satan.
Didn't the cop say SHE asked them to leave then trespassed? Can cops both say leave and trespass near immediately?
Female law enforcement is a joke.
How could she have RAS for a crime she just learned about and hadn't read?
Arrested in a public building . This is a power trip.
These fucking moron will keep doing this shit until the lawsuit start coming out Cops pension funds and these town employees! It will sto when these morons learn they will personally have to pay
The bully Council official needs to be taught a lesson. Please President Trump deal with him.
In most situations, you generally cannot be arrested solely for leaving the scene after someone calls the police on you if you are not actively committing a crime or are not considered a suspect, as you have the right to leave unless you are detained or arrested; however, depending on the circumstances, leaving could complicate the situation and potentially lead to further investigation if the police need to speak with you.
theres no reason to leave a small town court if there is something you are against
Since it's on camera, the guy that lied to the police to weaponize them needs to be arrested, and the cops that were tyrannical for doing it beed to be fired and arrested. QI excludes civil right violations, so they cannot claim QI.
I honestly dont think an officer should be able to withhold the reason they're arresting someone.
She get's more than a B+. But ya, she should have stuck to "I don't have to provide you with ID unless I've commited a crime". She almost was doing that, but then conflated it with needing to know why she was being removed from the meeting. Also you can't be arrested for trespassing unless you've been trespassed and still refuse to leave, which was not the case… they were all waiting for the supervisor. Something you failed to bring up. No one was trespassing.
Female cops…
She is the uncomfortable pig.🐷🤡🤡🤡🤡
Interesting how the Town Supervisor tells the cops he wants someone arrested for violating their POLICIES. This cop doesn’t know basic Civics.
Perhaps they should watch the Saturday Morning Cartoons.
“I’m just a Bill”
You can be ejected from a city hall public meeting if you are disrupting the meeting. This includes:
Refusing to sit down after your allotted speaking time has ended
Shouting out or yelling repeatedly
Protesting so loudly that it interferes with the meeting, even if you are in a different room
Public officials may refer to removing someone from a meeting as "trespassing". However, they may also use the excuse of "abusive" or "demeaning" comments to silence speakers who are critical of officials or offer a viewpoint they dislike. This violates First Amendment principles.
In the middle of an investigation for a call for service, it generally makes sense for police to ask for someone's ID if they have a reasonable suspicion that the person is involved in the crime being investigated, as they may need to verify their identity to further the investigation; however, if the person is not considered a suspect at that point, the police might wait until the investigation is further along before requesting identification.
When an overweight female cop shows up to any call it always becomes a shit show.
Tyrannysaurus 🦖
Immediately i heard the "yup" over the radio i was like "uh oh …a female supervisor???? 💀🤣" AttitudinousTyranny incoming!!! 😭🤣
The hate for law enforcement is EARNED. Like how respect is earned, not given… they have 100% earned the hate for their entire profession, it wasnt just given to em cuz people just dont like cops… n yet they still have the gall to wonder why they are hated universally.
Case one you know they do not have to show id, obstruction is a secondary charge. Then to follow she can not be trespassing from state property.
Is that a public place? Can you be trespassed from public property.
She needs to sue them Federally yo the point where the Oswego p.d. would have only enough money left in annual budget to only be able to afford used police cars to replace their current worn out ones.
The whole thing is wrong
She should be able to speak at a town meeting. Especially if she has something to say. As a resident. Tax payer
1st and 4th amendment rights are everyone’s right in America. Though law enforcement can arrest and detain anyone up 48 hours without cause and charges. Policy is not Law. An individual has to be trespassed and removed from the property. If they come back then then are trespassing. That council member definitely has a problem with her. Also being held accountable.