This Is Why You NEVER Give Consent To A Search!

This Is Why You NEVER Give Consent To A Search!

Get The Civilian Rights Handguide here: https://a.co/d/aDvE0xL

Submit your video here: https://forms.gle/FyrRquHvYtgjUDAw7

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9z3BI7KqKg&t=0s

The Watch Mann’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@thewatchmann

Sources:

City of Houston v. Hill- https://bit.ly/36hULEM

Colten v. Kentucky- https://bit.ly/3HyH1WM

Rodriguez v. United States- https://bit.ly/2LS1sqc

Brendlin v. California- https://bit.ly/3zsURGt

Terry v. Ohio- https://bit.ly/2SFAnK9

United States v. Dancy- https://bit.ly/3FJ2tfJ

People v. White- https://bit.ly/3FPZRwH

Ark. R. Crim. P. 11.3- https://bit.ly/4cbjQSN

Howe v. State- https://bit.ly/3FPhjBr

source

Share this post

33 thoughts on “This Is Why You NEVER Give Consent To A Search!

  1. I'm confused about what is the traffic stop and what is the detainment. If someone walking by had walked up to the traffic stop after the officer had said the detainee was free to leave, the officer could have said "please stay back and don't approach the traffic stop." But when the the detainee walks up after he was free to leave, that's ok…? It seems too aggressive and I think he's lucky it didn't escalate.

  2. Wait Officers C- and Citezen B-…ohh no!!
    I watch a lot, but don't usually comment, but apart from being testosterone filled, and deliberately aggressive, this Citezen is under-informed, misinformed and ill-informed. He also was the one who re-engaged or reinstated the stop when the officers, tried their best to wrap up the encounter, while looking out for his and their safety.
    They did everything legally, and practically right to make it home to their family.
    Officers A+
    Citezen Lower than F-

  3. He did highlight 2 things for the public that we might otherwise be unaware of: 1) there is no law that mandates that you remain in your vehicle. (Although the officer may give a lawful order to get back into the car) 2) He consented to a pocket search prior to them demanding a pat down, so when they did more than his consent he showed two things, he was willing to cooperate to show they were safe and he didn’t have a gun in his pocket, but they had already decided on a different path and outcome that was not based on their the fear for their safety at all but rather power and control over him. This is what most violent criminals do to their victims, they exercise power and control first to instill fear.
    I do agree the watchman could have said less but anyone who has been in his shoes knows that no matter how many times you have confronted this issue, you know how bad it can go in a matter of seconds. One fast movement and deputy #2 would have drawn his weapon. That alone can make even the most well trained person nervous and forget all the “right” things to do. I think he did his best in the face of adversity and is probably his own worst critic. The only thing that will help you remain calm in these situations is repetition and practice.

  4. your takeaways about this video are flat out wrong. you literally contradict yourself in the same breath. this fool was hostile and erratic from start to finish, and then you site the case law that makes that reasonable suspicion. you say the cops have no right to pat him down unless they ask him to take his hands out of his pockets, and you dub this over the footage of them asking him to keep his hands out of his pockets.

    why are you carrying water for what it clearly an unwell and dangerous person?

  5. He did highlight 2 things for the public that we might otherwise be unaware of: 1) there is no law that mandates that you remain in your vehicle. (Although the officer may give a lawful order to get back into the car) 2) He consented to a pocket search prior to them demanding a pat down, so when they did more than his consent he showed two things, he was willing to cooperate to show they were safe and he didn’t have a gun in his pocket, but they had already decided on a different path and outcome that was not based on their the fear for their safety at all but rather power and control over him. This is what most violent criminals do to their victims, they exercise power and control first to instill fear.
    I do agree the watchman could have said less but anyone who has been in his shoes knows that no matter how many times you have confronted this issue, you know how bad it can go in a matter of seconds. One fast movement and deputy #2 would have drawn his weapon. That alone can make even the most well trained person nervous and forget all the “right” things to do. I think he did his best in the face of adversity and is probably his own worst critic. The only thing that will help you remain calm in these situations is repetition and practice.

  6. It’s sad that because the cops didn’t BREAK the law or violate rights, they get a C-! In the real world, that’s a “F”! Period. These cops failed in every way possible… maybe not in a total law breaking movement, but professionalism, courteous behavior, maintaining standards, and EGO!! Any man who can be controlled by his emotions, or allows his EGO to make him make mistakes and bad decisions, when he cannot control himself to not get himself in trouble… that is A WEAK MAN, and he shouldn’t have a gun or a badge!!

  7. For the police, traffic stops are the worst.  It is very easy for a person to pull a gun out and shoot.  The "auditor" gets out of the pickup and repeatedly reaches into his pockets, which is very concerning. The pat-down should include the pockets and waistband.  It is too easy to judge the police.  Let's put you in the police's place, and what would you do?  The policeman was kind enough to write a warning and not a ticket.  The "auditor" put himself in a very tense station, which was uncalled-for. The "auditor" should get a "D" and the police at least a "B".

Post Comment