Video: Police Cruiser Road Rage

1. Details/link: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/2023/01/08/video-cops-exhibition-driving-incident-under-investigation/

2. Cops aren’t allowed to be judge and jury. They had no right to inflict punishment. There other means available.

3. If you ask me this is reckless driving. They do this crap in a crowded intersection and bystanders get hurt all the time. I have to side with the cops on this one.

4. Vehicular assault against a pedestrian reckless endangerment of life safety deliberately causing property damage.

5. The fact that there was a citizen between the two cars seems to me to be problematic.

   The risk to the citizen's life seems like a risk that was at a minimum, to be unwise.

   Abolish qualified immunity
   And the DEA.

6. Sheriff odie sloop "don't tear up my cars"…….

7. A banjo player … share your plickin & grinnn , post some vids.

8. Looks good to me. Sometimes the police do need to use force. The problem is that most of them are too stupid and hateful toward the public to know when it's OK and when it's not. This was a lucky guess.

9. They are pack animals. And hunt in group's

10. These people are clearly breaking the law. Creating a hazard on a public road and a danger to the stupid onlookers!

11. The crime is the assault and near killing of the pedestrian. He was s split second from being killed between the two cars.

12. Frightening to think there are people out there who think you have a constitutional right to shut down public roads and tear it up to your hearts content. Doesn’t democracy presuppose that most people possess at least functioning intelligence?

13. weckless driving and evading police id say u can ram em…….

14. lights and siren middle of the road that guy has no right of way done video ends

15. So is it reasonable for Arkansas SP to perform PIT maneuvers at over 100 MPH on a regular basis? There are videos of this all over YouTube. Seems like a death sentence

16. Are you wearing a Dom Mazetti “Shred Zeppelin” shirt? 😂

17. I thought the mob was going to go after the pigs.

18. im the first guy to say throw the book at the cop when they screw up, but in this case, im 100% okay with what was done by the cop. he used the cruiser to stop a dangerous event, and try to prevent the perps from fleeing.

19. The fool fool jumped in front of the cop, trying to help his friend escape. No sympathy

20. Did that cop HIT THE PEDESTRIAN?!?

21. "Pedestrians were around"? He hit a pedestrian. SMH

22. Poor coverage on a matter which is firstly a subjudice nature. 1. Events such as these in any jurisdiction are fraught with inherent risks to any and all participants. 2. By the footage provided there are questions as to what happened. Reliance on the 4th amendment and support of those committing serious offenses and claiming or guessing at what actually happened is a most dangerous position to make your claims. Further the information provided may be considered as criminally misleading and encouragement to many others to commit serious crimes by their actions as well as support for innocent people who may not appreciate the significant risk to them at in these situation. Simply blogging your views through your channel as shown in this instance is subjective and reckless disregard for the safety of society. Further should objective judicial review of all circumstances find the actions of the officers albeit with conflict have been justifiable. It is doubted that from your position you would be able to accept truth but instead simply prefer to a conjectural approach to matters by your subjective views.
    Oh.. And one last thing. If people wish to engage in the exhibition spin outs and similar dumb behaviour there are numerous places, safety measures that can be very quickly and easily set up as well as proper regard for all citizens rights to use their roads for ALL citizens constitutional and human rights. Wake up. If you do have a degree in law it certainly raises the question in these plods as to whether you were any good as to earn a degree or properly interpret the law.
    One could like to see you on the defense table when a competent prosecutor prosecutes matters like this.

23. Great work by police!

24. This isn't different than crotch rockets taking control of the road and inturuppting (sp?) traffic.

    That said, why not open up abandoned parking lots and such, for exhibition. Everyone that enters the property MUST sign a release that they know of dangers and take responsibility.

25. Most states pitam when they take off why can't you do whatever you need to do to stop them

26. There's now enough footage or information from the video for me to be able to draw a conclusion either way

27. I love that his buddy took off to help in the other charger!

28. I don’t see what’s so wrong here…

29. they should sell belts in this town. everybodys pants be hangin down

30. They should have done this on a private street. I mean they got caught. Cop lights and they tried to get away. Guess what people get hurt and cars get wrecked. Sad really. Just pull over collect your tickets and hire a lawyer to get off.

31. This is my city. The officer’s niece was in that charger. He was emotionally driven bcus he told her about the crackdown on “take overs” and warned her about the aggressiveness they were goin to implement. Every time Birmingham builds something new like our new skate park they tear it up with takeovers.

32. Always great content!

33. If the civilian car had rammed the police cruiser it would have been considered deadly force and police would have responded accordingly. Why is it not considered deadly force when the cop does it?

34. Insane

35. 👏😁👍

36. Those cars are so incredibly dangerous and the people treat them like toys. People get killed and seriously injured frequently from their behavior. I'm gonna go ahead and side with the police on this one and think even if the driver himself was critically injured or killed the police would not have been out of line and stopping it.

37. Any unreasonable could see that they intended to run the officer over. In other news, the righteous government will outlaw all natural gas stoves for your public comfort.Can I get a "Wull Yeaaah"?

38. Nice shirt

39. Wow

40. I hate stupid take overs. I see no issue here.

41. If the case is about ramming the vehicle I think its the wrong case. 100% if a vehicle is driving recklessly and is potentially endangering people near the road (which he is and can EASILY lose control cause serious injury to pedestrians or other drivers) then YES, they SHOULD be able to ram a vehicle to stop it. BUT…. they should NOT be able to ram a PEDESTRIAN which is ABSOLUTELY what they did.

42. What about ramming his car into the person's body!?

43. There is NO freedom on display here.
    Gross Interference is on display for all by the camera man for encouraging and directing flight, the man on foot putting himself between the cars, and the second private driver putting his vehicle between the subject cars.
    Morally, counsel should walk away from all those cited at those intersection takeovers and similar improper uses of roadway. I say this because that is why private racetracks open up and offer the use of closed facilities for this "behavior". Seems like bee ell emm should try to defend these here.

44. Dam. That looked like attempted murder.

45. I’m not worried about the ramming a car but ramming a person means you gone to far. The cop could the person

46. Gotta call it as I see it.
    Rare for me to say, but I have ZERO problems with the police action that I saw here. PC was dropped in their laps and an easy case can be made for ramming the car to prevent uninvolved innocents from being hurt.

47. Cops were doing their job on this one.

Comments are closed.