WATCH LIVE: Missing Mom Murder Trial – CT v. Michelle Troconis – Day 17 – Everything Law and Order Blog

Jennifer Farber Dulos vanished on May 24, 2019. Dulos, a mother of five, was in the midst of a divorce and custody battle with her former husband, Fotis Dulos. Michelle Troconis and Fotis Dulos were in a relationship during the time of Jennifer’s disappearance. Troconis is accused of conspiring with Dulos to murder Jennifer and cover up the killing. Jennifer’s body has never been found and it is assumed that she is dead. Michelle Troconis now faces trial for her alleged role in this brutal crime.
#MissingMomMurder #MichelleTroconis #lawandcrime

NOTE: Both sides Waived Their Opening Statement, but No Reason was Given.

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

For Advertising Inquiries, Please Contact: sales@lawandcrime.com
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

32 thoughts on “WATCH LIVE: Missing Mom Murder Trial – CT v. Michelle Troconis – Day 17”
  1. Michelle admits to holding the garbage bag open while fotis put something in the bag during her police interview????? What did she not look what he was putting in the bag? Did she close her eyes?

    This is one NOT SMART female

    Michelle DNA was on the garbage bag [confirmed] AND the the yellow/green sponge inside the knotted garbage bag [inconclusive, but not eliminated]. No wonder why the defense attorney was freaking out about the sponge, one or two sponges, who took it out.

    Question: did they not test for dna on either poncho? They only dna tested the blood spots on the ponchos, which were all jennifer's blood.

    Inconclusive on inside the gloves for michelle n fotis [not eliminated]. WOW!!!!

    Fotis is DNA in one of gloves 27,000 times more likely. All others eliminated—inside that bag of bloody clothes AND that other glove was inconclusive with fotis/michelle/lauren/kids….!!!!

    OMG jennifer DNA on the removed car seats!!!!!

  2. Her math skills are either really bad (which I doubt) or she's trying to be deceptive. This stood out to me before any of the sidebar conversation about 6th grade math. Astoundingly bias.

  3. I can’t let go of the fact that FD felt comfortable throwing the license plates in the storm drain in front of MT 😮 why would he do that knowing that he would be suspect number one , his live in girlfriend could easily be questioned and tell the police she saw him throw something in there. He felt it was ok to do so because she knew what he had already done , so no reason to hide any of his post murder actions from her.

  4. Boom The owner of the Tacoma was probably involved in the NEW CANAAN NAFARIOUS ACTIVITIES……. AND HIDING JENNIFER'S B…..DY! I'd bet!

  5. So, do we get a summary of all this evidence? I’m especially interested in all those items found to have FD’s and MT’s DNA and fingerprints. I suppose the fact that a lot of the things found in the trash that FD disposed of, whilst driving with MT, bear Jennifer Dulos’ DNA is incriminating in itself but I fell asleep during direct: can’t see the wood for the trees.

  6. I just realized this — everyone complains about Michelle Troconis chewing gum during the trial. I wonder if this is a defense strategy because her defense is that she was cleaning gum off of her hand on the sidewalk, not dropping evidence down the drain.

    I subconsciously thought “I could see that because she’s always chewing gum”… then I realized that’s probably EXACTLY why we see her chewing gum, with a whole jar of gum on the defense table — to subconsciously plant this in our heads prior to that evidence coming out.

  7. There is no solid DNA evidence linking Michelle. The state is wasting jury’s time. Why are they presenting all this? I want to hear only about evidence with Michelle’s DNA on it. The state is not convincing me. I am so disappointed. I thought there was going to be some of her DNA on this evidence.

  8. Anyone else find it hard to retain anything the dna lady is saying? She may know her stuff and be able to read a report but has no ability to make me understand it. If I were the stenographer I would throw my machine at her

  9. Someone already asked this question I think, but does anyone know if they swabbed the inside of the gloves? It makes sense that Jennifer's DNA is on the outside of the glove – and that her killer's DNA is in the inside of the glove

  10. What a complete waste of the Jury's time. This DNA language means absolutely nothing to them. Give the results in lay terms.

  11. After two failed attempts to get the truth from MT, it's highly unlikely she did not know what was happening. She did assist Fotis, somehow, some way. In hockey, if you assist, you get noted for it! Don't forget, MT made a big production about the shower on the morning of…WHY?

  12. If the toothbrush is Jennifer’s DNA then why don’t they testify that DNA found on evidence a reddish stain matches Jennifer (about 2 hours 7 minutes in) rather than matches a toothbrush. Much more effective testimony.

  13. I mean if the prosecutor is saying Pawel's hair could have ended up on the sponge because his hair was on his car, then it's only fair to also assume Michelle's touch dna was on the bag because it was taken from her house and she used bags from that same box before…I mean knife cuts both ways dude!

    Also "isn't it true except for the hair, Pawel was elimintaed from every single other evidence recovered?

    Well again, except from touch dna on the bag she was too!

  14. Say what you want about the defense lawyer but he is the only reason we understood ANYTHING today:
    1. Michelle's touch dna was in the outside of one of the bags (that came for a bag box she bought and used on her house which could explain it)

    2.The hair was Pawel's.

    3.Everyone was exluded from being the second dna profile on Jennifer's clothes, but most importantly, Mawhinney was never tested against ANY of the evidence when we have an unidentified male all over Jennife's clothes?!?! LIKE WHY?!

Comments are closed.