WATCH LIVE: Missing Mom Murder Trial – CT v. Michelle Troconis – Day 26

1. Brilliant prosecutor.

2. I normally liked the prosecution throughout the trial but I don't appreciate his hostility toward the defense's Professional witness, I think the prosecutor was completely disrespectful to this Dr & Professor. Thank you Judge for slapping the prosecutor for his actions, I would have told him that you will show every witness respect in my courtroom or you will be removed.

3. Police lying during an interrogation shouldn’t affect your answers if they are the truth.

4. This expert BILLED only 11 hours since august 2020…?

5. The state slaughtered the memory lady

6. The memory expert immediately changed her attitude when the prosecution started asking her questions. Clearly a biased “expert”

7. Not a fan of this judge.

8. Before i say this, ive folllowed E. Loftuses career since AP Psychology in 10th grade and I did watch both Durst trials. I am also aware that Loftus is quite controversial.

   I lost all respect for the purported chat moderator 'JenLo' who rather then making effforts to chill the floodgates of insutls and invectives hurled Mrs.Loftus's way (i.e, youre not allowed to make fun of ANY witness–according to chat rules). The chat moderator also stps in and fills in gaps for newer trial watchers so that, ideally, no one is left behind as far as courtrooon and legal concepts and vocabulary. The main moderator for this channel does a really good job of overall assuming the position of the content creator on various tops (i.e., youre watching a conservative show; you get conservative moderators and vice versa. But the problem with "JenLo" just joining the stampede of hatred for Loftus was thats not the official position of the channel. Secondly, it does not promote healtthy discourse or dialog about her arguments or whatever she had to share. And finally jokes about her 'memory' only serve to make the entirety of the chat MORE IGNNORANT and less educated moving forward because the question of wether or not Loftus has crappy memory has no bearing on wether her research and her arguments are sceinntifcally and logicallly valid and well-founded. Thats called an 'ad hominem' logical fallacy. If a psychologist was testifying on his life work studying 'human nervousness in relation to public speaking' and when he testified, he appeared nervous; that says nothing about the quality of his peer-reveiwed scholarship. Why? Because you are attacking the man and not the arguments themselves. Oh and attacking him being nervous on the stand violates your OWN chat policy that you never enforece when its not convient to do so.

   i expect this comment to magically disapper,

   Thanks,
   Have a Great Day

9. Professor Loftus also appeared as a defence 'expert' in the Houston Wig Shop murder case, she was a total disaster that day too.

10. SEAN DID A BRILLIANT JOB ON CROSS!! MITHCELLE IS GUILTY AS SIN!!!

11. The memory expert is very impressed with her own 'accomplishments'.

12. Sorry memory lady I do not think it is ethical to implant false memories for science ….disgusting witness I hope the jury see through her she is vile

13. This trial has gotten national attention. She's already guilty in the court of public opinion. Even if she isn't found guilty in court of law, life will never be the same for MT.

14. No surprise why she did not testify on some of those big cases. She’s terrible, but she would do it for the money in a heartbeat.

15. All of this expert’s testimony is general without even being tailored to each situation. She is not speaking to the defendant’s interrogation. Get her off the stand.

16. Oh gosh misinformation! She’s one of those. Michelle was not beaten, tortured etc during her interrogation. Why no objection for here say as her colleagues said blah blah blah.

17. Ok let’s. Talk. Time to buy an expert and good thing Michelle’s family are super rich. Just because you have a 48 page CV doesn’t mean you are smart and this lady is all about the money as she stated herself. I don’t believe her for a second. My dad was a pow and very glad she wasn’t his dr as he would have been more screwed up than without her “expert” opinion. Michelle was not treated like a POW. Not even close! Her whole testimony is crap and an embarrassment to UCI which is an excellent school sans her. Pathetic sell out.

18. Omg between the defense attorney and the memory expert it's like zzzz

19. I find it infuriating that law enforcement constantly have their hands tied behind their backs when it comes to catching criminals. So now the perception is that they used underhand tactics to entrap Traconis? For gods sake, how are cops supposed to catch murderers? Pray that they confess?

20. I was trying to watch the last day of trial and it says you have to pay. I don't understand why. I've watched every day for free, but today it's pay only.

21. The lady prosecutor is asking bad questions of the realtor lady.

    All she needed to do was have her refer to the exhibit that SHOWS the times she reached out to FD on 5/24 and times FD finally responded.

    The lady prosecutor is easily pulled off her game.

    As soon as defens called the lady realtor to stand even I could anticipate the text messages betw her & FD would be at issue.

    Come ON

22. Shohorn was disrespectful to all of the state’s witnesses but that wasn’t addressed???

23. State prosecutor is amazing!!

24. I'm not able to find a live feed of this trial today…..what happened??

25. I followed this trial all those days now- it really is disgusting for me to see MT not taking the stand, not taking responsibility for any of her actions. Life of another person has no value for her, she accepts the death of another person, a mother of 5 innocent children. And in the end she pretends not understanding English👎👎🤮🤮🤮🤮

26. Very weak evidence👎

27. Unaliving someone is seeped in the perps memories. She just out for $$$$$$

28. Where is the defendant’s laptop , replaced by a binder , going low tech now

29. Judge Randolph made this possible to view this trial – he is brilliant

30. This is where Shannon Smith went wrong by not using this witness!

31. Guilty! Lock her up

32. Next question Horn did he have a French fry making machine? Were there good?

33. I’ll say it again wealthy people 😒 what a bunch a knuckle heads Greek Easter Greek salad what dos that have to do with Jennifer being murdered?

34. Why is Michelle allowed to have a cell phone?

35. the defendant is obviously innocent Fotis was a manipulator and took his lies to the grave however right now Michelles defence is letting her down. His line of questioning is repetitive and badly put together , it unhinges his own witnesses which in return make them look ridiculous

36. And she’s a memory expert ? 😂

Comments are closed.