WATCH LIVE: Missing Mom Murder Trial – CT v. Michelle Troconis – Day 26 – Everything Law and Order Blog

Jennifer Farber Dulos vanished on May 24, 2019. Dulos, a mother of five, was in the midst of a divorce and custody battle with her former husband, Fotis Dulos. Michelle Troconis and Fotis Dulos were in a relationship during the time of Jennifer’s disappearance. Troconis is accused of conspiring with Dulos to murder Jennifer and cover up the killing. Jennifer’s body has never been found and it is assumed that she is dead. Michelle Troconis now faces trial for her alleged role in this brutal crime.
#MissingMomMurder #MichelleTroconis #lawandcrime

NOTE: Both sides Waived Their Opening Statement, but No Reason was Given.

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

For Advertising Inquiries, Please Contact: sales@lawandcrime.com
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

36 thoughts on “WATCH LIVE: Missing Mom Murder Trial – CT v. Michelle Troconis – Day 26”
  1. I normally liked the prosecution throughout the trial but I don't appreciate his hostility toward the defense's Professional witness, I think the prosecutor was completely disrespectful to this Dr & Professor. Thank you Judge for slapping the prosecutor for his actions, I would have told him that you will show every witness respect in my courtroom or you will be removed.

  2. Before i say this, ive folllowed E. Loftuses career since AP Psychology in 10th grade and I did watch both Durst trials. I am also aware that Loftus is quite controversial.

    I lost all respect for the purported chat moderator 'JenLo' who rather then making effforts to chill the floodgates of insutls and invectives hurled Mrs.Loftus's way (i.e, youre not allowed to make fun of ANY witness–according to chat rules). The chat moderator also stps in and fills in gaps for newer trial watchers so that, ideally, no one is left behind as far as courtrooon and legal concepts and vocabulary. The main moderator for this channel does a really good job of overall assuming the position of the content creator on various tops (i.e., youre watching a conservative show; you get conservative moderators and vice versa. But the problem with "JenLo" just joining the stampede of hatred for Loftus was thats not the official position of the channel. Secondly, it does not promote healtthy discourse or dialog about her arguments or whatever she had to share. And finally jokes about her 'memory' only serve to make the entirety of the chat MORE IGNNORANT and less educated moving forward because the question of wether or not Loftus has crappy memory has no bearing on wether her research and her arguments are sceinntifcally and logicallly valid and well-founded. Thats called an 'ad hominem' logical fallacy. If a psychologist was testifying on his life work studying 'human nervousness in relation to public speaking' and when he testified, he appeared nervous; that says nothing about the quality of his peer-reveiwed scholarship. Why? Because you are attacking the man and not the arguments themselves. Oh and attacking him being nervous on the stand violates your OWN chat policy that you never enforece when its not convient to do so.

    i expect this comment to magically disapper,

    Thanks,
    Have a Great Day

  3. Oh gosh misinformation! She’s one of those. Michelle was not beaten, tortured etc during her interrogation. Why no objection for here say as her colleagues said blah blah blah.

  4. Ok let’s. Talk. Time to buy an expert and good thing Michelle’s family are super rich. Just because you have a 48 page CV doesn’t mean you are smart and this lady is all about the money as she stated herself. I don’t believe her for a second. My dad was a pow and very glad she wasn’t his dr as he would have been more screwed up than without her “expert” opinion. Michelle was not treated like a POW. Not even close! Her whole testimony is crap and an embarrassment to UCI which is an excellent school sans her. Pathetic sell out.

  5. I find it infuriating that law enforcement constantly have their hands tied behind their backs when it comes to catching criminals. So now the perception is that they used underhand tactics to entrap Traconis? For gods sake, how are cops supposed to catch murderers? Pray that they confess?

  6. The lady prosecutor is asking bad questions of the realtor lady.

    All she needed to do was have her refer to the exhibit that SHOWS the times she reached out to FD on 5/24 and times FD finally responded.

    The lady prosecutor is easily pulled off her game.

    As soon as defens called the lady realtor to stand even I could anticipate the text messages betw her & FD would be at issue.

    Come ON

  7. I followed this trial all those days now- it really is disgusting for me to see MT not taking the stand, not taking responsibility for any of her actions. Life of another person has no value for her, she accepts the death of another person, a mother of 5 innocent children. And in the end she pretends not understanding English👎👎🤮🤮🤮🤮

  8. the defendant is obviously innocent Fotis was a manipulator and took his lies to the grave however right now Michelles defence is letting her down. His line of questioning is repetitive and badly put together , it unhinges his own witnesses which in return make them look ridiculous

Leave a Reply