WATCH LIVE: Strangled Wife Murder Trial — MA v. Cara Rintala — Day Two – Everything Law and Order Blog

Cara Rintala faces her fourth trial for the 2010 murder of her wife, 37-year-old Annamarie Cochrane-Rintala. Authorities say was strangled to death in the Massachusetts home the married couple shared. The slain woman was found at the bottom of their basement staircase, bloody and beaten, cold to the touch, and covered in paint.
#CaraRintala #StrangledWifeMurder #lawandcrime

Read more on this case: https://bit.ly/45DyH41

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

36 thoughts on “WATCH LIVE: Strangled Wife Murder Trial — MA v. Cara Rintala — Day Two”
  1. This defense attorney trying to imply that a highly experienced paramedic after a life-long career isn't able to recognize rigor mortis is, frankly, disgusting. Nobody, not even most police officers, is around more dead bodies than us (well, maybe MEs, but you know…) and we absolutely 100% check for it, because it is one of only 4 certain signs of death. We HAVE to check it and we HAVE to know what it feels like. And OBVIOUSLY a dead person rolling over like a wooden statue is rigor. It's so stiff, it isn't even funny. I'd understand a discussion about "well, was the finger really stiff or did she just have arthritis" and stuff like that – but the HIP and the KNEE didn't move AT ALL, not to mention the BACK. She was a stiff log, for Pete's sake! If a paramedic did NOT realize this was rigor, he should be off the job. GAH, I hate defense attorneys like this who are trying to save their client by portraying everybody as incompetent!

  2. As someone who’s been a juror twice, Brutus Fieri comes across as rude and disingenuous. I don’t know the outcome of the trial at this point, but a lawyer who is gaslighting every witness at some point lacks any credibility. I’d guess that the jurors are already feeling that at this stage of the trial.

  3. I view these trials as I have time, and I'm typically way late to the "party". Anyway, just watching and feel the need to say, ???Two days worth of, how dead was this poor lady? Stiff is freeking stiff, YO! As in NO WAKEY WAKEY? Are there classes. For. That? Really? Could you squander tax bucks more creatively, please? Show some respect.

  4. The defense attorney is horrible. She will lose the trial just because she is so aggressive and rude. The questions she asks really make no points , her tone and manner score points for the other side

  5. There is so much about the approach of the Defense Attorney demeanor…. but when you see the glaring mis-steps of the investigators and their purposeful "wasn't my part of the investigation" hard not to treat them as hostile witnesses. Don't forget this happened in 2010!

  6. Defense attorney has plenty of prior testimony from the first three trials to impeach witnesses…I bet that reasonable doubt will be created and the defendant will be found to be not guilty.

  7. Scapicchio is a complete badass. She’s there to do her job, not win a popularity contest. Defending her client requires raising reasonable doubt. She’s doing an incredible job of that by putting on proof of prior inconsistent statements of state witnesses. It takes vigilance, skill and many hours of work outside the courtroom to do that during a trial. Regardless of the defendant’s guilt or innocence, she’s lucky to have Scapicchio.

  8. I wonder if this defense attorney is irritating the jury as much as she is irritating most of us.
    I'm giving this trial one more day and if the irritation continues I may just stop watching and just keep an eye ot for the verdict. RIGHT!!!!

  9. I have to have to sound all the way up to hear others but when this defense atty yells her questions it's blowing my ears out. She so grating and disrespectful, I guess that's what she's going for.

  10. Defense Attorney is not always asking judge to approach witness as she should, very argumentative and speakes over witness. That Attorney really needs to calm down and stop being so eager beaver. Why in the world would the defendant be under the victim anyway. That makes absolutely no sense!

  11. I'm half way through Day 2 and I feel like the defense attorney is just muddying the waters by picking apart every sentence made by the police. If there was strong evidence of innocence wouldn't she be trying to score bigger points than whether he touched the victim to check for death or for rigor mortis?

  12. I really liked the EMS witness, a true vocational and humane professional. Not a good idea to discredit him or seem to be attacking him by your tone of voice imo and, so far, I’m siding with the defendant. The defence attorney’s line of questioning about rigor mortis is unpleasant and counterproductive.

Leave a Reply