Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fE2FIbRLnjY
Law&Crime Network’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/LawCrimeNetwork
Source:
Articles-
https://bit.ly/3eYsGcT (contains a copy of the citizen complaint and internal investigation report)
https://bit.ly/3RFn865
https://bit.ly/3Sc76Qu
Fla. Stat. § 901.151- https://bit.ly/3rxIgNV
Fla. Stat. § 812.015- https://bit.ly/3xzw9Fr
Fla. Stat. § 901.15- https://bit.ly/3zaI4cs
Bent v. State- https://bit.ly/3qMtLHq
JSO Response to Resistance Policy (Order 551)- https://bit.ly/3qLfhYq
Fla. Stat. § 843.02- https://bit.ly/3rxR6eD
Zivojinovich v. Barner- https://bit.ly/3zicI3N
Vadimsky v. City of Melbourne- https://bit.ly/3oET50V
Robinson v. State- https://bit.ly/3BR9A1h
Seiracki v. State- https://bit.ly/3BNhoBb
Thanks for watching today's episode. Be sure to watch to the end to see the aftermath of this incident. It helps the channel out a lot too! See you in the next one. Cheers!
However, the store employee did not witness shoplifting, the store employee was not paying attention when the customer paid for the item.
Just show the receipt
This guy was working as an off duty security guard.
If he’s a mall cop, why isn’t he wearing a mall cop uniform and obeying mall cop rules? How is it ok he’s in his police uniform with his police cruiser using his police taser and his version of police rules? His duty to protect and serve is blurred by serving two masters. And that’s complete horse 💩 that he couldn’t see the store’s video.
No,your a tyrant and just wanted to taze someone,she even stated ,let's go in the store and look at the video,you said you don't have access to video,you being a cop saying we have to obey your lawful order,you can order the store to show you the video
An employee saying she didn't pay id hearsay,no ground for arrest,go check the cameras and see,if she did steal them you have probable cause,but not without proof,
"Sorry, I threw it away. Goodbye"
why is she so immature lol
She filed a lawsuit and lost. Also Her lawyer argued she lost her job over this. Justice was served
He should be charged with assault and also with endangering minors. He was OFF DUTY! He was not operating as a leo!
Lol…
So why don't y'all suggest just what an officer suppose to do in a case like this. Just let a thief go free. I think they need to adjust the laws. This is so stupid. An to make money off it it's bs. An just live how they always wanna through that racial thing in there
Complaints against officers should never be handled by "internal affairs". they have a vested interest in protecting the officers that they represent. At minimum, this is conflict of interest. At maximum they are actively attempting to subvert the justice system to protect a guilty party.
how is "resisting arrest without violence" a legal term? I literally cannot fathom a scenario where you can try to resist arrest with anything but a minimal level of force.
He could have walked into the store…looked at the security camera and it ended there. It's a stupid battle of wills where both parties are being ridiculous. The cop is supposed to be the professional here.
I smelled spoiled bacon !!!
So he lied and gets away with it…
I'm with her 100% for not showing her receipt.
Black people are tired of being treated like animals and criminals. A lot of police seem to be so willing to accost us our dignity and pride by humiliating us. That lady didn’t want to be humiliated 😢 and would rather go out swinging. This shit breaks my heart. And there should definitely be a rule that if you call, you must get involved.
He isnt an officer in this capacity, he is a security guard.
What a sorry piece of trash
Hope she pressed charges