Chuck Schumer to Nancy Pelosi, democrats are cowardly, incompetent and without courage to begin impeachment proceedings says Col. Larry Wilkerson

Subscribe to our page and support our work at https://therealnews.com/donate.

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

The Real News is a viewer-supported media network bringing you the stories from the frontlines of the fight for a better world.

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

44 thoughts on “Col. Larry Wilkerson on Mueller and Courage to Impeach Trump”
  1. Why tf is Larry still in the Republican Party? He always makes it a point mentioning it, but heck, he isn’t on their program at all, just as little as he agrees with the corporate Democrats. Do i just get something wrong about the republicans?

  2. 200% disagree. Above the law until your political party agrees? Nonsense. Partisan politics have ruined our democracy, along with the corrupt electoral process.

  3. Because POTUS knows what side its bread is buttered. Democrats feed from the same swamp. Don’t bite the hand that feeds you.

  4. Just more FAKE NEWS FAKE NEWS FAKE NEWS poor little Liberal's still trying to figure out how to Wipe their own ASS, The Liberal mantra is Stupid is that Stupid Does and thanks to the Loony Left they prove that everyday.

  5. If the Democrats are stupid enough to impeach Trump, they will help him get re-elected. But they are doubling down on stupid.

  6. So… Col. Wilkerson is trying to convince me that there is more than one political party with only minutely different strategies? Nice try

  7. Trump is guilty of obstructing a crime that did not exist. The Democratic party said before Trump was elected into office they will impeach him and no one sees a problem with this, or are white American leaders giving the benefit of doubt that they are to be believed even when everyone else knows it's a lie, this behavior can be see with police shootings unnecessary wars and corporate propaganda. The lie is not the new truth.

  8. I'm curious about this. F.e., how likely is it to impeach Trump, and if this could be successful, then why wasn't it done with Obama, GW Bush, Billy Clinton, GHW Bush, …, for they ALL deserved to be impeached, plus sentencing to LONG-term prison, etc. (?) And if this was to happen to Trump, then what about Bolton, Biden, etc., … the whole DAMN "gang"? And that should of course include the chiefs in the MIC, plus Big Oil, f.e., so not only members of the White House Admin. Plus, of course, members of Congress, both the House … and Senate. After all, FIRST oath in the US military, for ALL members, no exceptions, is to DEFEND the Constitution against ALL enemies, both foreign and domestic; ALL of them needing to be STOPPED. If impeaching Trump is successful, then what the hell about these other enemies "from within", I wonder. Practice of law must be integral, rather than selectively biased, say. Otherwise, what hope is there for future real improvement, correction! Being partial is surely not going to help much. It'ld be good to include an interview with Larry about this … in these terms. Because he's been a professor of govt and public policy, I'ld be interested in knowing what he'ld say about ALL of this. Impeaching Trump, alone, and imo, would be far from enough.

  9. I would never vote for a McConnell over my Democratic Rep just because McConnell is "ruthless" He's been bringing down America for years. The Dems have passed over 100 bills that McConnell will not bring up for a vote–including an Election Interference bill.

  10. I think Dems are afraid that to pull the "impeachment thread" that would unravel and bring about discoveries and subsequent investigations to reveal a web of rot and corruption that would bring down crooks in both parties… like the flies they are. They don't do anything out of a sense of morality… they do it because they smell money.

    The further thought occurs that Trump won't go down without a fight. He'll sling as much shit and mud as he can and Dems are afraid of getting their lilly-white clothes all dirty… despite a lot of them being just as swampy as Trump is. They just hide it better. Barely.

  11. The democrats are in a tough position. They have the president dead to rights on obstruction of justice and impeachment would be justified. Mueller explained that as clearly as he legally was allowed to, shit, he practically shone the bat signal to the sky with the words "Guilty". But the senate will not convict under any circumstances so it's definitely possible it would help Trump, he'd play the witchhunt card, and when the senate doesn't convict, he can claim vindication & exoneration, and help him get reelected. At best the whole thing ends up being a waste of time. But if they don't impeach, the dems look weak. But that's they're true nature, they're paid to lose, corporations love strong republicans and weak democrats.

  12. Everything is possible, Hillary can speak of that. he's out of control which is the case since he coned his way through and backstabbed his voters, now we all knw how evil, indulged in his psychopathic behavior he became with all evidence. THERES NO GOING BACK.

  13. Democrats, no guts? They're paid to have no guts.
    The system is completely broken and we focus on Trump?
    I find this to be a diversion and a waste of time.
    Maybe it's on purpose.

  14. Pelosi is waiting to see the investigation of the investigators. The impeachment hearing in the Senate would parade all the shenanigans of Russiagate; the spying, fisas, 302s, Ukraine, UK, it would even revisit the 2016 primary where the DNC-HRC cheated Bernie. Maybe pelosi isn't such a lame brain.

  15. I wouldn't say this is about lacking courage, I would say this is about wanting to regain credibility. The Mueller investigation was a witch hunt, made Trump look better to his fans, and the only thing they have on him is that he asked them to stop the witch hunt. It's not "obstruction of justice" if there's no justice there to start with. I don't care what the deep state's own Colonel Winky Dink says, and I'm sick of anything operatives say being parroted as "news" by the mainstream and the corporate left. Why not report on Tulsi Gabbard or Yang? Why not do something useful and positive instead of diving straight back into conspiracy theories and lunacy? Don't you EVER want the Dems to get elected again?

  16. Well, the real reason may be that N Pelosi knows that there is no other Democratic prospect, not even the Catholic from Hell J Obiden, that can garner the votes Prez Trump can. Votes aside, the circus wouldn't run so well without Prez Trump.

  17. After Trump's overt treason in Helsinki, I find it shocking that we are not now talking about his impeachment in the past tense.

  18. The justice dept is staffed by the president, it would be a conflict of interest to assume the executive branch can investigate and bring charges against the head of the executive branch, that's why it's Congress's job to hold the President accountable, because it needs to be done by a body that doesn't answer to the president. He's not above the law… that IS the law.

  19. You see by now how weird and strange and backwards this all is. I encourage you, to read both Ken Starr and Robert Muller reports for yourself. In the weird, divergent tales of Ken Starr and Bob Mueller, I think that we see America’s decline and collapse reflected in an eerie, haunting detail and glow. Both Special Counsels. Both with the same powers. But the one who used his power with abandon did so over nothing, to impeach a President for having an affair, simply because he could. But the one who didn’t, wouldn’t, who left everyone baffled and guessing, did so when the republic needed those powers to be used the most. The bad guy was willing to abuse his power to the hilt   but the good guy wouldn’t use his at all, even in a time of peril and desperation. come on, really? What the hell? so, for now, The bad guys won, in other words, not just because they were awful and horrible and cunning and cruel.  but because the good guys weren’t quite good enough. Not strong, wise, courageous, noble, or true enough. That says a very great deal about America  and  it’s history, it’s trajectory, it’s rise and fall,  to me. Maybe it does to you, too. ~PEACE!

Comments are closed.