How the Mainstream Media Ignores the Climate Change Crisis

1. Pack your bags we're going places.

2. We are in serious trouble. Only when Canberra is under water then maybe our Australian government will care.

3. Not only are they ignoring global warming but they seem to be cutting down on their coverage of natural disasters.

   Our economy is on precipice, our environment is on a precipice, our geo-political world structure is on precipice to war and hence, humanity is on precipice of complete self destruction.

4. This entire video nobody talks about the easy solutions to the problem like industrial hemp, even the most liberal progressive news channels will just sit around whining complaining (not doing shit) about it, talk about how we can fix it instead, no one felt motivated to go do something about climate change after watching this video

5. "…more powerful storms, droughts, floods, and rising sea levels"?

   On which planet is this happening? Because it certainly isn't on Earth.

   In fact there have been fewer, and less severe events of this kind than usual in the last twenty or thirty years.

6. When movies give us more truth than the news.

7. Anyone concerned about climate change should listen to this. Our House is on Fire. A song dedicated to Greta Thunberg. https://youtu.be/mkRffDRrbOI

8. Today's climate change deniers are tomorrow's mass murderers. They are unwittingly commiting genocide and ecocide on a scale not seen since humans first emerged as species over 200,000 years ago.

   Their ignorance, intransigence, and irrationality are preventing any meaningful action, and the systemic change required to prevent or ammeliorate global warming. If they do not listen to reason, or educate themselves, then they deserve nothing but scorn and contempt.

9. TY.PLEASE DONATE to INDEPENDANT,COMMUNITY NEWS "REPORTING the STORIES IGNORED by corporate MEDIA."DEMOCRACY NOW!!!!!!!PLEASE,TY.(I"M ASKING YOU out of respect for DEMOCRACY …NOW!)

10. The CIA-embedded, corporate-controlled "media" will never cover Climate Change.

11. Main stream media wisely left it alone because IPPC has not got it right once since trying to sell us a bill of goods.
    There are no increases in storms or floods or tornadoes or hurricanes.
    The costs have gone up because folks keep building in the same places….doh….and building on flood planes….doh.
    Get a life or learn to adapt because the climate will do what it has always done and that is change.
    There is no global warming and I can't believe they are still flogging a dead horse in hopes of reviving their religion.

12. after being caught in an obvious lie, they changed global warming to climate change. welcome to another mini ice age.

13. Let's also take the role of the public into account. Media nowadays are dependent on clicks, because people don't want to pay for news anymore. Apparently we don't click enough on well informed items about climate change.

    This all doesn't apply to propaganda channels like Fox etc. They just push lies.

14. Republicans and corporate Dems stand squarely in the way of protecting future generations from our pollution. If they do not step aside we must kill them. It is life and death

15. I'm not sure I will ever be able to fully buy into the alarmist view on climate change considering the source. (Al Gore)

    I believe that climate change is occurring, that we should invest in renewable energy but I don't trust any source that tries to influence me based on fear! (The if we don't act within 12 years, we're all screwed argument!)

16. Ignoring? They are wittingly working against it.

17. If global warming doesn't actually result in warmer weather, then how do you expect the Corporate Media to try to sell it to the rubes? One question: Does global warming cause drier or wetter weather? This should not be a difficult question to answer since we have numerous examples of global warming and cooling to examine.

18. What happen to global warming? Climate-gate and how to hide the decline.

19. Climate scientists have been caught misrepresenting global temperature models and lying about the historical data. There is more to this issue than meets the eye. James Corbett covers this issue very well.

20. They doesn't care it they care about the love of the money

21. Obviously, it's the Russians behind it ……..

22. Ummm… The climate scam is BS – they ignore it because they KNOW it's BS. They are the proponents of it, so exempt themselves from reducing their 'footprint' while screeching 'emergency' BS to scare the public into parting with their cash and reducing their lifestyles which in turn enriches the media's masters, which in turn funds the media! Look out your windows – barely anything has changed in 40 years… you don't need to media to TELL you what's going on – look for yourself! Climate change is normal, it will always happen, and it can be seen as a positive thing if you get the scammers out of your ears! Increased temperatures means thriving plants which means increased food production for animals AND people! CO2 is PLANT food ffs!

23. Climate change Hysteria more like real bulshit news

24. How the Mainstream Media Ignores military pollution, wars, bombs, geoengineering, weather control + true science?

25. Media sells people what they want to hear – that 's they sell!

26. Paul Jay, invite Dane Wigington to talk about this—–if you have the courage.

27. The elites think they ARE doing something about the climate crisis—–see David Keith / Bill Gates / Harvard / Operation Solar Shield They have a plan—-BLOCK SUNLIGHT check: GeoengineeringWatch.org

28. One of the problems for those promoting climate change is their tendency to foul their own argument. An example is the statement that oil companies get 5 times more time that global warming does. Then the image shows a tiny green spot and and big red blob about 15 times bigger. My mum told me a million times not to exaggerate.

29. And their "solution"?? Block out the sun. Friggin brilliant..

30. Dumb old scientists. What do they know? They're probably being paid off by the solar-panel-industrial complex.
    .
    .
    .
    joking, folks, joking

31. The media and scientists need to distinguish between natural climate change and human-caused climate change. Far greater storms, fires, and floods occurred before the increased use of fossil fuels. It is erroneous to claim that all climate change is human caused. If the media and scientists don't distinguish, then they are merely speading hype.

32. It is pretty simple. Main stream media depends on capitalism. Capitalism is in conflict with life on this planet.

33. this is only part of the story, makes me wonder how "real" this news really is

34. And why should we let a handful of horrible rich bastards decide the life and death of the entire planet? That’s what we need to consider: match class with climate! Get people angry with the truth!

35. The ideology is that…..so long as someone else is worrying about it, I don’t have to worry….

36. Thats heavy.

37. The corporate media are owned by the military industry and the fossil fuel corporations – no surprise that they deny it. The world needs to install sanctions against the USA. The USA is invested in fossil fuels, so they must deny it. You take away US consumers ability to buy electronic toys and they'll come around fast.

38. Anthropogenic overuse of * SULFATE AEROSOLS, * INITIATES GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE!!!
    
    Human deposition of SULFURIC ACID via stratospheric GEOENGINEERING with SULFATE AEROSOLS, PERTURBATED (ie. heated) in our atmosphere, resulting in Secondary Organic AEROSOLS (SOAs)…this is a major component of FINE-PARTICLE-POLLUTION, and most likely contributing factor of CLIMATE CHANGE!!!
    
    GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE, prior to the 20th century, appears to have been initiated primarily by major changes in volcanic activity. SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) is the most voluminous, CHEMICALLY ACTIVE GAS emitted by volcanoes, and readily oxidizes to SULFURIC ACID, within weeks. But trace amounts of SO2 exert significant influence on our CLIMATE…all major historic volcanic eruptions have formed SULFURIC ACID AEROSOLS in the lower stratosphere that COOLED the earth's surface ~0.5 °C for typically three years.
    
    The potential negative effects to control Earth's temperature by SPRAYING PARTICLES into the stratosphere, to then be PURTURBATED (ie. heated), is not being diligently characterized! Human, [anthropogenic] sources of atmospheric SULFUR oxides, including SULFURIC ACID deposition from stratospheric CLIMATE ENGINEERING with SULFATE AEROSOLS, accounts for 75% to 80% of SULFUR oxides, in the air…the US alone, releases about 20 million tons of SULFUR dioxide into the air each year…by comparison, the large eruption of the volcanic Mt. Pinatubo in the Philippines in 1991 released between 15 and 30 million tons.
    
    Excess SULFUR OXIDE (SO2) has been linked to abnormally low ozone levels…SO2 depletes the ozone layer by reducing the solar flux it absorbs, between 180 nm-390 nm…the same range for the photolysis of O2, which is necessary for ozone production..since photolysis is reduced, ozone production is also reduced!
    
    Change in CO2 temperature is NOT a change in atmospheric temp…CO2 comprises only 0.4% of ALL gases above our heads. The trick of climate doomsayers is to draw their conclusions, obtained from the Arrhenius formula for CO2 (only 0.04% of atmosphere), then apply that change of temperature to the WHOLE global CLIMATE SYSTEM; this is bad science, at best…but closer to FRAUD! Is the atmosphere composed only of CO2…why calculate the change of temperature of a mass of carbon dioxide, and then after say it is the change of temperature of this trace gas that now becomes the temperature of the entire global climate system?!?! Even if Arrhenius was right, any change of temperature obtained from his formula is exclusively a change of temperature of the mass of CO2, NOT of the atmosphere!!!
    
    Thermal diffusion of CO2 shows, it loses the energy it absorbs almost instantaneously, leaving no place for, any kind of storage of thermal energy by carbon dioxide (CO2) in our atmosphere. THE SUN ANGLE, which affects BACK RADIATION through WATER VAPOR (e.g. H2SO4), increases atmospheric temperature…the effect is as high as 200 TIMES that of CO2, and works CONVERSELY…meaning, CO2 has a NEGLIGIBLE EFFECT (if any) on atmospheric temperature or CLIMATE…and limiting its consumption will have as negligible of an effect!
    
    The planet has shown itself to be far less sensitive to increases in CO2 than the climate models suggest, and much more sensitive to SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) CLIMATE ENGINEERING via, STRATOSPHERIC INJECTING OF AEROSOLS, AND OTHER CHARGED PARTICLES (to include military/civilian rockets, craft/vehicle's and munitions exhaust/pollutants as particles) comprised of metals and toxic chemicals, such as BARIUM, NICKLE carbonyl, SULFUR oxides, SULFUR hexafluride, bromotrifluoromethane, etc. '…to then PERTURBATE these pollutant particles in our atmosphere, utilizing HIGH POWER RADIO WAVES (HAARP, Arecibo Arecibo, EISCAT, Tromso, etc.) from space and ground stations! Consequently, creating Secondary Organic AEROSOLS (SOAs), a major component of our 'FINE-PARTICLE-POLLUTION!'
    
    SULFUR dioxide (SO2) itself is a pollutant, and major culprit in the deposition of ACID RAIN, and CLIMATE CHANGE. SULFUR dioxide is a dense, colorless, TOXIC, non-flammable gas, which oxidizes, via several chemical pathways, to SULFUR trioxide. At normal temperature and pressure, oxygen-rich SULFUR trioxide (SO3) is liquid…however, it is highly reactive in the atmosphere, combining with WATER VAPOR/droplets to produce SULFURIC ACID deposition (H2SO4), know better as "ACID RAIN."
    
    ACID PRECIPITATION accelerates exchange processes at all surfaces, and causes leaching and mobilization of metal ions (especially Ca, Mg, Al, Mn, Fe, and Zn) from soils, and bedrock…both aquatic, and terrestrial ecosystems have been affected by acidification, but the most obvious effects to date are on freshwater systems.
    
    Since the 1960's, collection of rainfall at recording stations has led to the recognition that the chemistry of the rain has changed…especially in its increasing SULFATE and hydrogen ion content…the pH decreased, and areas receiving ACIDIC RAIN have expanded. Inorganic acids contribute to the acidity of the rain, with SULFURIC ACIDS and nitric acids accounting for 95% of this acidity…SULFURIC contributing 2.5 to 3 times more than nitric!
    
    The source of the increased rainfall acidity is NOT industrial emissions of SULFUR DIOXIDE alone, but SULFATE AEROSOLS, often carried several hundred kilometers from where "INJECTED."
    
    The concentration of SULFUR dioxide in clean air is around 0.01 ppm or less but in heavily "INJECTED," (polluted) urban environments, the concentration rises to between 0.1ppm and 2ppm…10 to 200 fold increase! Most fossil fuels (including aviation/jet fuel) have SULFUR, and when burned, combines with oxygen to generate SULFUR OXIDES.
    
    When exposed, SULFUR can DAMAGE the internal enzyme systems of humans/animals…as well as, cause irritations of the eyes and throats of humans/animals, when inhaled in the gaseous phase. Due to the limited possibilities of destruction of the SULFUR bonds, the damaging effect of SULFUR on humans/animals is mostly BRAIN DAMAGE, through malfunctioning of the HYPOTHALAMUS, and damage to the NERVOUS SYSTEM. Laboratory research on animals has indicated, SULFUR can cause serious vascular damage in veins of the BRAIN, HEART, and KIDNEY'S…these tests have also indicated that certain forms of SULFUR can cause FETAL DAMAGE, and congenital effects…mothers can even carry SULFUR POISONING over to their children, through BREAST MILK.
    
    Most scientists studying our CLIMATE are "experts" in only a small area, and not aware of Earth’s overall CLIMATE SYSTEM nor of the endless research studies, projects and implementations of different technologies/techniques being developed and utilized. Sets of EMPIRICAL DATA have been collected, and connected in new ways to give a coherent, and logical illustration, to better understand our atmosphere, CLIMATE SYSTEM, and how human manipulation (CLIMATE ENGINEERING) and pollution, affects the entire micro to macro-system.
    
    Existing international law only imposes a few procedural duties, on States who are responsible for CLIMATE ENGINEERING field research as well as a handful of particular prohibitions, and constraints. These “CLIMATE ENGINEERING” / “GEOENGINEERING” methods pose a far greater risk to humans, and the environment, than any current law/regulation could curtail…and far, far beyond any wishful outcome, associated with manipulating our CLIMATE SYSTEM!
    
    Stratospheric GEOENGINEERING with SULFATE AEROSOLS, is the most significant factor in Secondary Organic AEROSOL (SOA), 'FINE-PARTICLE-POLLUTION,' and CLIMATE CHANGE itself…a massive reduction of (SO2) SULFUR OXIDES should be our TOP PRIORITY, in order to reduce both CLIMATE CHANGE, and ACID RAIN!!!

Comments are closed.