Evan Greer of Fight for the Future discusses how giving ICE access to the DMV databases of driver’s license photos poses universal risks. Facial recognition technology is risky, unreliable, and has the potential to cause mass false arrests, violating the rights of refugees, immigrants, and citizens alike

Subscribe to our page and support our work at https://therealnews.com/donate.

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

The Real News is a viewer-supported media network bringing you the stories from the frontlines of the fight for a better world.

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

21 thoughts on “ICE’s Expanded Use of Facial Recognition Threatens All Our Civil Liberties”
  1. So even pictures and cameras are racist?! I've also heard that pine cones and puppies are racist. That crazy talk is more concerning than any surveillance problems.

  2. Universal Basic Income MUsT be based on the Production/collection of Personal & Biometric DATA. All info is being collected with or without the civilians permission so the only way to fix this problem is to simply receive “CryptoCurrencies” through a UBI program.

  3. Amazon, using data mining and biometrics to produce ICE hitlists, you mean the same company used to produce call lists for those polls pushed on us by the MSM, that have DNC approved candidates overperforming, especially Biden, with Bernie underscoring and Tulsi, a national figure with a wide political spectrum appeal, barely registering? The one that was forced by Bernie to raise it's salaries? You mean that company?

  4. Commit a misdemeanor; camps/prison
    Collapse the economy, steal millions from a campaign fund, shoot an unarmed man in the back; its ok
    The people who want this technology are not friends of humanity rather beneficiaries of ever increasing power and decreasing oversight.
    No government agencies should use this against those they govern

  5. Facial recognition ought to be banned in all its forms no matter who is doing it. The government is motivated to be corrupt because of power and companies because of money so allowing either one to use facial recognition will necessarily result in fascistic use of it because absolutely power corrupts absolutely.

  6. When I was tricked to leave Germany to go live in the land of the free, back in 93, everyone I knew glorified the USA! I mean if anything had a label such as made in USA, it seemed u could trade it’s weight in gold and diamonds! Boooiiii, how the times have changed! How could we let this happen, I feel deceived, I feel angry, but the shame is the hardest to deal with! I just seems to stack and stack and stack! I still love u America, albeit merely fantasy and memory by now! Love&blessings

  7. Like it matters anymore! Who trades freedom for security, deserves neither! And that’s just what we got now, we really deserve no better! The dream turned into nightmare! See ya on the flip side when the trumpence fade!

  8. 750 bucks a kid a day they are charging Americans to lock brown people up. America as a country spends more on locking them up then edutcating their own children. (The most free country on earth with the most people in prison) Now they are just adding an arm to the industrial prison complex.
    We all know it does not cost 750 dollars a day to lock a kid in a cage and throw a bologna sandwich at them. The two companies that were about to go bankrupt until they got massive ice contracts. GEO group and CoreCivic. Making big bucks know on the tax payer dime, while Wayfair stoped the ordering of bedroom furniture, with other basic necesities get stripped away to make more money.

  9. Yes! Banning this use of tech. definitely seems to be the right thing to do. I can't presently imagine why it shouldn't be banned. I think having security/surveillance cameras is okay and it's much because of me that we finally got some in the apt bldg where I reside. But these cameras aren't of the digitizing facial recognition kind. They're only for security for the tenants. We had some serious problems in this bldg several years ago and it was like no one else was complaining, so I complained, for we have a right to peace where we reside. Broadscale, widespread digitizing facial recognition isn't the same thing; I think anyway. What other apt bldg owners do is for the tenants to see to. Where I reside, I have a damn right to have a say. If you want to live in a nut-house, then that's your choice, but not where I reside. This place has become peaceful ever since and that's the way I like it to be. After all, I pay to reside here. But, widespread digital recognition "stuff" is spooky, and I think you're right to refer to the 1984 story by Orwell. You didn't mention his name, but many people will know what you surely mean in or by referring to 1984. I don't know that much more can really be said about the topic of this video, for it already says enough; but, (there're often buts in life) we'll see. Good news, I hope.

  10. I think the feds should maintain extra rights only for egregious crimes: terrorists (including white supremacists), serial murderers/rapists, etc. and ICE could–never–get these data unless those people would be found guilty of only those crimes.

  11. If it can be done, it will be done. We can protest, and lawmakers can order government not to use this technology, but we all know it's going to anyway.

  12. See how they use Black folks in the Media? But Immigration hurts us most.
    1)The anchor speaks about the software as if it will discriminate against us. PLOY TO MAKE US CARE.
    2)The thumbnail features a Black man yet most illegals are Hispanic. PLOY TO MAKE US CARE

Comments are closed.