Mueller’s Statement: Why is it Unconstitutional to Indict a Sitting President?

1. So a president has the legal immunity for every crime in the book. Theoretically they could turn the country government into a dictatorship and never get in trouble. Nice to know we are led by a volatile and erratic rule of law. This is how you metaphorically play Russian roulette, when your freedom is gambled through expected “good faith” from politicians. Truly idiotic

2. Double standard. If you are a Democrat, you can get impeached for a BJ.

3. There has yet to be any evidence presented to back up the Russia collusion narrative, so this guest is talking pure speculation, and repeating unproven claims by the intelligence agencies.

4. Mueller is on the Globalist DeepState Elites payroll.

5. "No one is above the law"

   "Oh but we can't indict a sitting president. There is a process to go through first and it is against DOJ policy"
   What a load of horse shit. We've literally headed down the world of technicalities versus what the founders intended.
   If you can't indict a sitting president, then he is, by definition, above the law. You don't need a PhD in anything to see what's happening here.

6. If the president can't be charged with a crime he is above the law.

   Wicked people try to over petty and over complicate things.

   Can you lock me up? "No" Then i'm above your law.

7. Uhh, no the collusion part is clear. The part that is not clear is that he obstructed justice. Nice try to slip that in there…

8. Yeah and they said Russian agents hacked the DNC and gave the documents to WikiLeaks… Where is that proof? If that's a lie then the whole investigation or part may be based off lies.

9. She's misquoting muller right after they showed him using his own words

10. Really disappointed in this video Real News. The Democrats not the Russians interfered in the Democrat primaries. The FBI never got access to that server, so your guest is spreading Fairy Tail propaganda. The Democrats themselves said in a New York court they have no obligation to choose the candidate based on the primary. So please stop supporting this Russian interference nonsense. The only person who could prove one way or another what was really going on (Seth Rich), mysteriously murdered before he could expose the conspiracy. Much of this can be validated by Donna Braziles book.
    Please don't take sides real news. We respect you because you keep it objective.

11. You are supposed to be viewed as innocent until proven Guilty! They now want to reverse this?!?

12. Nixon and Bill Clinton were charged and impeached for crimes committed while in Office. Is Trump's case different that he cannot be indicted ??? Dealing with Russian mafia, tax fraud, paying money to silence extramarital sex, etc.

13. Well that took the pressure off of the Clinton/DNC 2016 election meddling. Wasn't that what it was supposed to do. Because she's an open and closed case.

14. This guy is either nuts or descending into nutsness ! what specifically is the crime? It took me a while to realise that this segment is part of the mainstream BS segment that most of are trying to avoid by tuning into the real news network. is this the direction this channel is taking? Sharmini Peres from Boltimore? Are you serious? What is your stance.?

15. Two years of Mueller and who knows how much money and now the lawyers will have a thousand interpretations of what happened. The diversion has been a success.

16. Mueller is contradicting himself.. he is part of the problem.

17. Is sitting president a king?

18. Barr and Mueller are contradicting each other. Barr in his sworn testimony said it was a "group meeting".
    Someone is lying.
    There are witnesses. The people in the group meeting. Isn't the truth in plain sight?
    Question the witnesses, one being Rod Rosenstein. He is a civilian now. Would he lie now?

19. Colbert keeps citing "evidence" of "collusion," but never cites a single person or example of such "evidence." He's operating from the assumption – unproven by the investigation itself, or the report, that the Russian Federation attempted to interfere in the election. We're back at Square One… which is what these types want. They offer nothing concrete other than their loathing for Trump. Well, Christ, most sane people loathe him – but that is hardly the same thing as proffering evidence of anything. Yet his spurious allegations got no push-back whatsoever from Sharmani. Am I watching MS-NBC?

20. I have not been this baffled by what I have just witnessed since the first time I watched a Neil Breen movie.

21. Is there a Soros, Steele, Rosenstein connection?

22. There's nothing Mr Mueller said that he didn't know before the alleged collusion began which begs the question, who, when and why did this concocted intervention, false accusation, expensive investigation initiate.

23. So essentially…Nixon was right.

24. A lot of Putin/Trump paid shills commenting on this one.

25. Won't charge Trump but will Assange, who is not a US citizen and allegedly offended when not in the USA. ????

Comments are closed.