Police Use Your Money to Buy Silence from Brutality Victims

1. There is/ are 5,000 gangs of cops in the USA. Maybe 5 or 6 in the gang and sometimes 3 or 4 gangs join up to form a multi zone/ county/ state wide GANG to include judges, prosecutors, defence liars, I mean lawyers, legislators, state supreme court idiot judges and on and on.

2. Sorry Terry Graham I'm too much already I got to get off I need your help like I asked I got to get your help

3. These pigs won't use their weapons on us they just want to show us what they got that's all then kill us

4. If that's all we got is bunch of f**** crook pigs and I'm f**** taking action

5. Yes it's all about the money like what happened in Monterey this shaking hands at they screwed me over f******protect my rights

6. Well said ; thank you guys for reporting. Awesome

7. That’s why you never heard anything else from the man they beat in the Stockton, California jail.

8. If our gov won't work for us then remove them and let us put people in that will take amunaty away from the po

9. WE NEED TO GET RID OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY! THESE PIGS, CRIMINALS WITH BADGES NEED TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR TYRANNICAL CRIMINAL ACTIONS! EVERY LAST ONE NEEDS CONSTANT INVESTIGATING AND JAILED FOR STEALING TAX PAYERS MONEY WHEN THEY ARE FOUND GUILTY FOR FELONY THEFT OF STATE TAX PAYERS MONEY! PLEASE ALSO HELP IN DEFUNDING POLICE, WE NEED LESS FELONY CRIMINALS WITH BADGES ON THE STREETS NOT MORE! AND GET RID OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY THAT THEY ALL HIDE BEHIND!

10. If there's nothing to hide.why pay.to sighn a gage order it's to cover up coruptuon that goes up the line that's why it's ok In our government officeles put all of this In place to cover what there doing look at insider trading the government officeles get it and not saposto invest in it cause it's withheld from the publice but all of these very officeles do and have made billions on it while we unfarly get left in the dark and there fighting to vote on the ones thay invested in abd blocked upthe ones Thst could help the people it's a greedy Instatution that needs to be repaired fix it and it'll fix police cause it' can be fare then

11. The trees gone rotten it's not a few there every where and there's too meny cops to keep the law suets down it's crazy the way we're heard by our government thay don't care it's all there is to it police army enymore

12. Taya is a fine woman and pretty to boot.

13. Corruption is rooted in power. The more we respect power, the easier it's for officials to be corrupt. Power is intertwined with authority. So unless we question authority and stop obeying mindlessly, corruption will take root.

14. This is why I'm pro 2nd amendment. Imagine the accountability problems with so many different law enforcement agencies. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_state_and_local_law_enforcement_agencies

15. The gag order didn't work in Bill Cosby's case??? Constands broke the law, stole his money and broke the gag order??? Oh, the gov helped her break the law???

16. Hey America! You now live in a police state because you failed to act whilst this cancer was developing. Now that it's here, where's the resistance? What ever happened to "land of the free"?

17. If it is just a bad apple scenario, then the entire orchard is contaminated and needs to be cut down and replanted.

18. the mayor would end up somewhere between marginalized into obscurity and dead faster than one could say jfk. have a nice day?

19. Authoritarianism rules and protects corrupt cops. How this works of how corrupt cops become MORE corrupt,is beyond me. Dated December 10th,2019. One way or another,there WILL be justice. Real justice. Not tyranny. It's a shame that taxpayers don't always have a say,because bureaucrats infect politics of the police unions – that start and are behind all this in the first place! Very undemocratic.

20. the policeforce is as bad as the worst cop since they all protect each other

21. The "mayor" has no power, they are pawns and are the buffer for the chief or commissioner of law enforcement, Serve and Protect at one time meant the People now, it means the Establishment of Commerce, we are taxed daily for the benefits we receive.
    Policy Enforcers are essentially tax collectors, no different than the "Highway Men" of the old westerns, robbing "Citizen's" that travel the roads.
    City Government is not the problem, the United States Supreme Court rulings regarding the standards or lack thereof for those that assume employment as policy enforcers, the rulings truly has no standards, no physical norms, no I.Q levles, no morals and values, just a body, many department's across the country are filled with tattoo wearing gang and cartel members just as the Military Armed Forces are.
    The "Mob" and the "Cartel's" ALWAYS ask "do you want the money or would you prefer to die" it's standard business policy. Gold or Lead.
    There are enough videos on YouTube that prove Policy Enforcers don't give a good damn about the "constitution" and even less about anyone's right to live, they are taught everyday the best ways to get away with murder and know that the judge's, prosecutor, defense lawyers all work for the Policy Enforcement department. Sad however True

22. DONT TRUST ANY GOVERNMENT–FEDERAL-STATE-LOCAL!!

23. I had a friend on a small City police force. Before going out on patrol, the watch commander would give "words of advice".
    At least once a week, he would tell them, if you have to shoot, shoot to kill. Wrongful death costs less in a law suit than a lifetime disability.

24. They're putting all black faces as representative. Strategic

25. I hate police every damn one

26. State officers may be held personally liable for damages based upon actions taken in their official capacities." Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991).

    "Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of limitations upon his authority." The United States Supreme Court, Federal Crop Ins. Corp, v. Merrill, 332 US 380-388 L1947)

    Cooper v. Aaron, By Chief Justice Earl Warren
    No state, legislator, executive or judicial officer can "War" against (or test the limitations of) the Constitution without violating their undertaking to support it (Breach of Oath/Contract, Treason??). The Constitution created a government dedicated to equal justice under law. The Fourteenth Amendment embodied and emphasized that ideal…no State shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Our constitutional ideal of equal justice under law is thus made a living truth. (Book, Our Nation's Archive © 1999 pg 701)

    ” An officer who acts in violation of the constitution ceases to represent the government”. Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp.94.

    AM14.3/HO, IR No person shall hold office if he rebels against or violates the U.S. Constitution (treason).

    The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government"

    You know ALL these folks are crooks. The constitution is a contract between us and them basically creating a company for and only for the benefit of the people and only with the consent of the people. We have allowed our leaders to break the laws of the constitution and law of the land for our "benefit". That is like telling a bank robber oh you want a million dollars to fund your agenda well hell by all means break the law, rob a bank, we don't care. They have taken over the company you own. They have broken the rules and force laws far from any authority to do so. They are each and everyone of them criminals who have stolen from the peoples to fund their own agendas, personal wants, and to help fund all the unlawful agencies and and run their control and ponzi schemes, their drug wars and the industrial war complex, the health care complex, the prison complex, these are criminals and the list goes on and on their seems to be no limit or shame to their crimes and criminal actions.

    If a man can not be trusted to govern himself then how can a man be trusted to govern a nation? We can not therefore we CAN NOT be a nation of men but a nation of law. Thus Thomas Jefferson said:

    "The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first."

    WE THE PEOPLE have ALLOWED this criminal take over by not enforcing the law. If you want to get a bank robber off the streets you have to arrest them and take back the money/assets they stole! it is that simple! when you replace them make them accountable for their actions and if they tip toe out of place arrest them. That is why we have law.

27. I think every government official state local and federal should be investigated. All their voting records examined and everything they have said in public and if they have not upheld, defended, and supported the constitution in every case they should be charged with every crime they have done that comes up in the investigation to the fullest extent of the laws and they should be made examples out of. These are people under contract and in offices of trust. If they can not be trusted then they should not hold or ever be able to hold any office of trust. That is what the law says and it should be enforced.

    illegitimate government
    https://www.facebook.com/Slydog1960/posts/2679444622099950

28. The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] All contracts REQUIRE full disclosure to be valid.

    Any court, government or government officer who acts in violation of, in opposition or contradiction to the Constitution, by his, or her, own actions, commits treason and invokes the self-executing Sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment and vacates his, or her, office.

    “Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit… includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public,… and if he deliberately conceals material information from them he is guilty of fraud.424 F.2d 1021UNITED STATES v.Horton R. PRUDDEN,No. 28140. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 1970 –

    “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297, 299, 300 (1977)-

    Fraud: Deceit, deception, artifice, or trickery operating prejudicially on the rights of another, and so intended, by inducing him to part with property or surrender some legal right. 23 Am J2d Fraud § 2. Anything calculated to deceive another to his prejudice and accomplishing the purpose, whether it be an act, a word, silence, the suppression of the truth, or other device contrary to the plain rules of common honesty. 23 Am J2d Fraud § 2. An affirmation of a fact rather than a promise or statement of intent to do something in the future. Miller v Sutliff, 241 111 521, 89 NE 651.

    EX POST FACTO LAW

    "The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since its unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment… In legal contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed… Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it… A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (the Constitution JTM) it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." Bonnett v. Vallier, 116 N.W. 885, 136 Wis. 193 (1908); NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425 (1886). See also Bonnett v Vallier, 136 Wis 193, 200; 116 NW 885, 887 (1908); State ex rel Ballard v Goodland, 159 Wis 393, 395; 150 NW 488, 489 (1915); State ex rel Kleist v Donald, 164 Wis 545, 552-553; 160 NW 1067, 1070 (1917); State ex rel Martin v Zimmerman, 233 Wis 16, 21; 288 NW 454, 457 (1939); State ex rel Commissioners of Public Lands v Anderson, 56 Wis 2d 666, 672; 203 NW2d 84, 87 (1973); and Butzlaffer v Van Der Geest & Sons, Inc, Wis, 115 Wis 2d 539; 340 NW2d 742, 744-745 (1983).

    ~ No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” — 16 American Jurisprudence, 2nd edition, Sec. 177; late 2nd edition, Sec. 256; ~

    “Insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (constitution) it is superseded thereby.” (16 Am Jur 2d 177, Late Am Jur 2d. 256)

    ” An officer who acts in violation of the constitution ceases to represent the government”. Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp.94.

    AM14.3/HO, IR No person shall hold office if he rebels against or violates the U.S. Constitution (treason).

    The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”

29. No accountability because if you do sue them the bill is not on them it is on the tax payer. This is akin to you having to pay yourself when you sue government officials.

    In old Roman law…………………
    In old Roman law the Police had to own property and that property was a bond sorta speak to ensure if they harmed you or your property that he was held personally responsible for his actions. If he messed up it could and most likely would cost him his property. Thus they were careful in what they accused one of. The imperium (police powers) controlled the action of the citizen in using his private property on the basis of his equal relationship with other citizens – that he not cause personal injury to them or their property, or harm to their right of exclusive use of private property. [Sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas = Use your own so as not to injure another's property. 1 Bl. Com. 306; Broom's max. 160; 4 McCord, 472; 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 2379..) (See Loeb edition: Remains of Old Latin, vol. III Lucilius and Laws of the XII Tables translated by E.H. Warmington, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1938, pp. 467ff.]

    Our laws reflect the same principles. What our officials have done is unconstitutionally protected themselves from accountability putting the punishment back on the people in the form of law suits against the government where tax payers pay for the crimes of the individuals working for the government. Congress even has a slush fund they pay off people who they sexually assault, with tax payer money. These are criminals folks.

    To disregard Constitutional law, and to violate the same, creates a sure liability upon the one involved:

    “State officers may be held personally liable for damages based upon actions taken in their official capacities.” Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991).

    ~ The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government” ~

    This includes ALL office’s Judicial, Legislative, and Executive. This includes everyone working for the government that takes a oath of office like police enforcing unconstitutional codes, statues, acts, ordinances and foreign and international treaties, and judges who also break their oaths enforcing them on the people to rob and steal for themselves and special agendas. Our government is corrupt from top to bottom. Why they are not being round up and jailed is only further proof of how far they have gone. Criminals always protect their fellow partners in crime. It is not ok just because “this is the way we do it now” It is unconstitutional and violates the rights of the people. It robs the people of life liberty property and justice. Enforce the constitution and remove the unconstitutional and criminal elements. Put the oath breakers in prison and charge them with violation of oath of office and what ever other crimes they have committed and seize their assets to pay back the citizens some of what they have stolen from them over the years. Put them in prison where criminals belong.

Comments are closed.