President Trump’s intention to withdraw from Syria was met with outrage on many sides, with people calling it a betrayal of a key ally in the Syrian conflict. Kurdish expert Edmund Ghareeb says there is probably a deal between Trump and Erdogan.
Subscribe to our page and support our work at https://therealnews.com/donate.
** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **
Trump's withdrawal from Syria is not only a betrayal of Kurds but the start of continuing chaos, why you ask? because Isis fled prisons, Turkey launched an attack on the Kurds who were the key force in defeating Isis. Turkey and Russia are now gaining from this, and so does Iran. What is the lesson one should learn about this? NEVER EVER BETRAY KURDS AGAIN!
It's the start of the biggest war the world's ever seen
Out of 1,000 people, how many would trust Trump?
What hasn’t been fluently answered is why haven’t they learned from the history of relying on super power sugar-daddy’s for sovereignty?
He's doing the bidding of his master putin….putin must have serious video of him having sex with under age girls that all were requested to look just like his…Daughter!🤮🤮🤮
Him🤬.and his friend Epstein 🤬 are truly sick!!! Old fucks!🤬🤬🤬…..
That's what everyone is truly believing is the real reason that he stays on his knees! For PUTIN!🤬….
P.S..
…..In essence…PUTIN…is!….
America's!…true!….Leader!🤬🤬🤬💔😞✌
I think it is only fair that Syria is allowed, with Russian support, to set up a security buffer zone on the Turkish side of the border to stop ISIL fighters regrouping in the north of Syria using the Turkish border.
Kurds made the wrong bet. The best the Kurds can do is align themselves with Assad. Trump made the right call to retract. You gotta start somewhere.
Trump's cutting off Hillary's state department's weapons and ammunition supply chain. Ammunition coming from China and weapons from Lybia. Thanks to Obama and Hillary Lybia is a third world country with open slave markets.
Hard to be informed when we are not getting any of the information. I agree we had no business within Syria but at the same time we are involved and we have to help our allies the Kurds out. It is in our best interest of the US that we help the Kurds find a good deal with Syria and do our best to keep the Turks out of this. Why does the US have the right to give up Syrian land by the way?
Besides, when has Turkey been a good ally to the US? What did Turkey do in this war but support ISIS terrorist? Are we only siding with the Turks because they have more money and power? Have the Turks taken up with Russia?
Anybody ask how Syria feels about a chunk of their country being broken off?
The saddest part is that only a few days after our withdrawal from Northern Syria is that Mike Pompeo has already labeled the Kurds as terrorists. Soon we will start attacking them as well. Let this be a cautionary tale to any group that thinks about working with the US, you are at best disposable, and at worst a new source of income for the military industrial complex.
I know trump is evil and 200000% Kkk, but at least he hates brown folks sooo much it gives us a heads up because he tells on his self all the time with his flapping fish lips.
I really believe all the stuff about getting rid of trump is a part of the elites plan to place obama back in place. He REEEEAAALY hates us but what's bad is he pretends to be on our side so we won't know what's coming.
I wonder if Republicans will now agree with impeachment since trump wants to pull out from Syria? 🤔 so over the pro war government.
We routinely betray the Kurds I think this is forth major one
!st of all, I am more than happy if it benefits Syria. It should benefit Syria and I have no problem if it benefits Russia and Iran. 2nd of all, how many of the Kurds in Syria now are actually from Syria? Many crossed the border illegally. Third the Kurds again threw in with the US. The US is doing BAD things in the Middle East. Well you make a deal with the devil this is what you get.
End to endless wars, for israel…
The US doesn't want to withdraw from Syria , The US won't turn on it's NATO partner Turkey The Kurds should Turn to Assad restrengthen Syria start nation rebuilding and with the help of there Allies Iran and The Russians who were invited by the Syrian government for assistance where as the US who were never asked by the Syrian government to be in Syria should get out, and take their proxies with them stop destabilizing the middle east for resources and to benefit there Zionist Masters, Imagine the money that could be put back into The US economy and infrastructure instead of wasting it on for ever wars
Very informative piece. Thanks.
I bet Erdogan promised he'd get some dirt on Biden.
Can the Aliens come and take this orange scourge from our planet immediately please???
lol, so-called 'anti imperialist' and so-called 'leftest' fighting to maintain and uphold imperialism and imperialist wars in the name of 'opposing Trump'. Limp wristed Democrat Party hacks,shills and dupes all!SAD
US needs to stay home and take care of our own country. Stop sticking our nose in other country’s business. No more war profiteering.
It will not end ….no great service at all….Isis has not been defeated … .
Oh come on RN .. U know very well it's all the pro Zionists that r against this. Y? Bc, Isreal uses the Kurds to create unrest n escalate it so the U.S. can go fight their wars to steal more land.
Kurds = betrayers become betrayed .. Karmais doing its job! (n NO, Russians eliminated Isis not the two-faced Kurds).
BRING THEM HOME!
This analysis is really poor, and in addition the questions asked were woefully ill-informed and anodyne, given the seriousness of the situation. A number of points that should have been made by this (ever diminishing in integrity) 'radical' news channel weren't made.
1) The reason the Turkish state is invading Rojava has got NOTHING to do with any alleged 'threat of terrorism' from the PYD/SDF. It is the 'threat of a good example' (the term coined by Chomsky) that motivates their rabid aggression. That and domestic Turkish politics, which are currently backfiring badly for the wannabe 21st Century Sultan. Rather than reverse from his drift to neoliberal austerity merged with far right authoritarian/nationalist centralism, he has decided to double down on this reckless and destructive gamble.
2) Trump's sudden 'resolve' to 'withdraw from Syria' is 100% smoke and mirrors. As with Erdogan, it is mainly driven by the need to distract attention from a pressing domestic crisis by creating another disaster abroad, and to apparently fulfil at least one of his campaign promises. In so far that he cares or has thought this out in advance at all, he foolishly hopes that his new Turkish 'allies' can get to the ISIS camps and the Euphrates before the latter either break free or Syrian forces and their allies cross the river and get there first. All the rhetoric about 'bringing our boys home' is just that – rhetoric. The reality is that 'our boys' and their British and French pet poodles will be caught as hated foreign bystanders in the middle of a chaotic multi-sided conflict and humanitarian disaster – where NOBODY are now their friends. The US helped to create the Syrian civil war disaster. And as an occupier and belligerent, it is therefore obliged under international law to resolve this diplomatically, peacefully, and remove itself in a responsible manner.
3) What has happened over the past few years in Rojava was COMPLETELY IGNORED by 'progressive' newscaster Greg Wilpert. This is indefensible for a channel with alleged socialist credentials. Autonomous Rojava, which came into existence where an accident of imperialist/great power history met an opportunity for heroic revolutionary activity, and with no friends INCLUDING its opportunist US 'ally', is a remarkable experiment in bottom-up direct democracy combined with exemplar new approaches to federalism, communalism, ethnic-religious plurality, ecology and radical feminism. But Wilpert ignored this socialist subject in favour of yet another 'big power' chess-game analysis set against the dreary academic pedantry of his interviewee Ghareeb – who also showed no awareness or understanding of the Rojava revolution. Why didn't they get a young activist from a Rojava solidarity group to speak instead?
And why was so much airtime given to hypocrite Republican critics of the decision or their corporate Dem equivalents? Who gives a damn what they think? The first duty of a truly socialist current affairs channel should be to the people on the ground in Rojava who are suffering and struggling, yet intimately involved in creating a revolutionary vision of a new Middle East with their bare hands, against overwhelming odds on all sides. WHERE'S THE COVERAGE OF THAT HERE?
And not one word about what the Syrian people think about Turkey and US violating the sovereignty of Syria
I dont respect any of those that doesn't think this was right