Venezuela’s Embassy: Activists vs. US Government

1. Oh, Shit!!!!
   Guaidó to president of EEUU n Israel
   Jajajaja

2. Good for you 🙂 best to you from Canada .

3. THAT ELLIOT ABRAMS IS A WAR MONGER,,HE SHOULD BE HAD UP

4. The United States is a disgrace to democracy.

5. Beware of FBI plants.

6. This “movement” doesn’t make ANY sense! No one from Venezuela there! I really hope one of my compatriot speaks with them and make them understand in a respectful way that they are being used by the criminals chavistas!! OMG poor people.. I feel sooo sorry for them really!!

7. "Success" is a relative term here… This must end!
   “Nationalist” refers to a given regime’s desire to nationalize foreign-owned means of production within its national boundaries. It should be readily apparent that such is an unforgivable sin against the foreign policy establishment in the United States.

   1893 – Hawaii (Liliuokalani; monarchist): success (OF)

   1912 – China (Piyu; monarchist): success (OF)

   1918 – Panama (Arias; center-right): success (SE)

   1919 – Hungary (Kun; communist): success (CO)

   1920 – USSR (Lenin; communist): failure (OF)

   1924 – Honduras (Carias; nationalist): success (SE)

   1934 – United States (Roosevelt; liberal): failure (CO)

   1945 – Japan (Higashikuni; rightist): success (OF)

   1946 – Thailand (Pridi; conservative): success (CO)

   1946 – Argentina (Peron; military/centrist): failure (SE)

   1947 – France (*; communist): success (SE)

   1947 – Philippines (*; center-left): success (SE)

   1947 – Romania (Gheorghiu-Dej; stalinist): failure (CO)

   1948 – Italy (*, communist): success (SE)

   1948 – Colombia (Gaitan; populist/leftist): success (SE)

   1948 – Peru (Bustamante; left/centrist): success (CO)

   1949 – Syria (Kuwatli; neutralist/Pan-Arabist): success (CO)

   1949 – China (Mao; communist): failure (CO)

   1950 – Albania (Hoxha; communist): failure (CO)

   1951 – Bolivia (Paz; center/neutralist): success (CO)

   1951 – DPRK (Kim; stalinist): failure (OF)

   1951 – Poland (Cyrankiewicz; stalinist): failure (CO)

   1951 – Thailand (Phibun; conservative): success (CO)

   1952 – Egypt (Farouk; monarchist): success (CO)

   1952 – Cuba (Prio; reform/populist): success (CO)

   1952 – Lebanon (*; left/populist): success: (SE)

   1953 – British Guyana (*; left/populist): success (CO)

   1953 – Iran (Mossadegh; liberal nationalist): success (CO)

   1953 – Costa Rica (Figueres; reform liberal): failure (CO)

   1953 – Philippines (*; center-left): success (SE)

   1954 – Guatemala (Arbenz; liberal nationalist): success (OF)

   1955 – Costa Rica (Figueres; reform liberal): failure (CO)

   1955 – India (Nehru; neutralist/socialist): failure (CO)

   1955 – Argentina (Peron; military/centrist): success (CO)

   1955 – China (Zhou; communist): failure (CO)

   1955 – Vietnam (Ho; communist): success (SE)

   1956 – Hungary (Hegedus; communist): success (CO)

   1957 – Egypt (Nasser; military/nationalist): failure (CO)

   1957 – Haiti (Sylvain; left/populist): success (CO)

   1957 – Syria (Kuwatli; neutralist/Pan-Arabist): failure (CO)

   1958 – Japan (*; left-center): success (SE)

   1958 – Chile (*; leftists): success (SE)

   1958 – Iraq (Feisal; monarchist): success (CO)

   1958 – Laos (Phouma; nationalist): success (CO)

   1958 – Sudan (Sovereignty Council; nationalist): success (CO)

   1958 – Lebanon (*; leftist): success (SE)

   1958 – Syria (Kuwatli; neutralist/Pan-Arabist): failure (CO)

   1958 – Indonesia (Sukarno; militarist/neutralist): failure (SE)

   1959 – Laos (Phouma; nationalist): success (CO)

   1959 – Nepal (*; left-centrist): success (SE)

   1959 – Cambodia (Sihanouk; moderate/neutralist): failure (CO)

   1960 – Ecuador (Ponce; left/populist): success (CO)

   1960 – Laos (Phouma; nationalist): success (CO)

   1960 – Iraq (Qassem; rightist /militarist): failure (CO)

   1960 – S. Korea (Syngman; rightist): success (CO)

   1960 – Turkey (Menderes; liberal): success (CO)

   1961 – Haiti (Duvalier; rightist/militarist): success (CO)

   1961 – Cuba (Castro; communist): failure (CO)

   1961 – Congo (Lumumba; leftist/pan-Africanist): success (CO)

   1961 – Dominican Republic (Trujillo; rightwing/military): success (CO)

   1962 – Brazil (Goulart; liberal/neutralist): failure (SE)

   1962 – Dominican Republic (*; left/populist): success (SE)

   1962 – Indonesia (Sukarno; militarist/neutralist): failure (CO)

   1963 – Dominican Republic (Bosch; social democrat): success (CO)

   1963 – Honduras (Montes; left/populist): success (CO)

   1963 – Iraq (Qassem; militarist/rightist): success (CO)

   1963 – S. Vietnam (Diem; rightist): success (CO)

   1963 – Cambodia (Sihanouk; moderate/neutralist): failure (CO)

   1963 – Guatemala (Ygidoras; rightist/reform): success (CO)

   1963 – Ecuador (Velasco; reform militarist): success (CO)

   1963 – United States (Kennedy; liberal): success (CO)

   1964 – Guyana (Jagan; populist/reformist): success (CO)

   1964 – Bolivia (Paz; centrist/neutralist): success (CO)

   1964 – Brazil (Goulart; liberal/neutralist): success (CO)

   1964 – Chile (Allende; social democrat/marxist): success (SE)

   1965 – Indonesia (Sukarno; militarist/neutralist): success (CO)

   1966 – Ghana (Nkrumah; leftist/pan-Africanist): success (CO)

   1966 – Bolivia (*; leftist): success (SE)

   1966 – France (de Gaulle; centrist): failure (CO)

   1967 – Greece (Papandreou; social democrat): success (CO)

   1968 – Iraq (Arif; rightist): success (CO)

   1969 – Panama (Torrijos; military/reform populist): failure (CO)

   1969 – Libya (Idris; monarchist): success (CO)

   1970 – Bolivia (Ovando; reform nationalist): success (CO)

   1970 – Cambodia (Sihanouk; moderate/neutralist): success (CO)

   1970 – Chile (Allende; social democrat/Marxist): failure (SE)

   1971 – Bolivia (Torres; nationalist/neutralist): success (CO)

   1971 – Costa Rica (Figueres; reform liberal): failure (CO)

   1971 – Liberia (Tubman; rightist): success (CO)

   1971 – Turkey (Demirel; center-right): success (CO)

   1971 – Uruguay (Frente Amplio; leftist): success (SE)

   1972 – El Salvador (*; leftist): success (SE)

   1972 – Australia (Whitlam; liberal/labor): failure (SE)

   1973 – Chile (Allende; social democrat/Marxist): success (CO)

   1974 – United States (Nixon; centrist): success (CO)

   1975 – Australia (Whitlam; liberal/labor): success (CO)

   1975 – Congo (Mobutu; military/rightist): failure (CO)

   1975 – Bangladesh (Mujib; nationalist): success (CO)

   1976 – Jamaica (Manley; social democrat): failure (SE)

   1976 – Portugal (JNS; military/leftist): success (SE)

   1976 – Nigeria (Mohammed; military/nationalist): success (CO)

   1976 – Thailand (*; rightist): success (CO)

   1976 – Uruguay (Bordaberry; center-right): success (CO)

   1977 – Pakistan (Bhutto: center/nationalist): success (CO)

   1978 – Dominican Republic (Balaguer; center): success (SE)

   1979 – S. Korea (Park; rightist): success (CO)

   1979 – Nicaragua (Sandinistas; leftist): failure (CO)

   1980 – Bolivia (Siles; centrist/reform): success (CO)

   1980 – Iran (Khomeini; Islamic nationalist): failure (CO)

   1980 – Italy (*; leftist): success (SE)

   1980 – Liberia (Tolbert; rightist): success (CO)

   1980 – Jamaica (Manley; social democrat): success (SE)

   1980 – Dominica (Seraphin; leftist): success (SE)

   1980 – Turkey (Demirel; center-right): success (CO)

   1981 – Seychelles (René; socialist): failure (CO)

   1981 – Spain (Suarez; rightist/neutralist): failure (CO)

   1981 – Panama (Torrijos; military/reform populist); success (CO)

   1981 – Zambia (Kaunda; reform nationalist): failure (CO)

   1982 – Mauritius (*; center-left): failure (SE)

   1982 – Spain (Suarez; rightist/neutralist): success (SE)

   1982 – Iran (Khomeini; Islamic nationalist): failure (CO)

   1982 – Chad (Oueddei; Islamic nationalist): success (CO)

   1983 – Mozambique (Machel; socialist): failure (CO)

   1983 – Grenada (Bishop; socialist): success (OF)

   1984 – Panama (*; reform/centrist): success (SE)

   1984 – Nicaragua (Sandinistas; leftist): failure (SE)

   1984 – Surinam (Bouterse; left/reformist/neutralist): success (CO)

   1984 – India (Gandhi; nationalist): success (CO)

   1986 – Libya (Qaddafi; Islamic nationalist): failure (OF)

   1987 – Fiji (Bavrada; liberal): success (CO)

   1989 – Panama (Noriega; military/reform populist): success (OF)

   1990 – Haiti (Aristide; liberal reform): failure (SE)

   1990 – Nicaragua (Ortega; Christian socialist): success (SE)

   1991 – Albania (Alia; communist): success (SE)

   1991 – Haiti (Aristide; liberal reform): success (CO)

   1991 – Iraq (Hussein; military/rightist): failure (OF)

   1991 – Bulgaria (BSP; communist): success (SE)

   1992 – Afghanistan (Najibullah; communist): success (CO)

   1993 – Somalia (Aidid; right/militarist): failure (OF)

   1993 – Cambodia (Han Sen/CPP; leftist): failure (SE)

   1993 – Burundi (Ndadaye; conservative): success (CO)

   1994 – El Salvador (*; leftist): success (SE)

   1994 – Rwanda (Habyarimana; conservative): success (CO)

   1994 – Ukraine (Kravchuk; center-left): success (SE)

   1996 – Bosnia (Karadzic; centrist): success (CO)

   1996 – Russia (Zyuganov; communist): success (SE)

   1996 – Congo (Mobutu; military/rightist): success (CO)

   1996 – Mongolia (*; center-left): success (SE)

   1998 – Congo (Kabila; rightist/military): success (CO)

   1998 – United States (Clinton; conservative): failure (CO)

   1998 – Indonesia (Suharto; military/rightist): success (CO)

   1999 – Yugoslavia (Milosevic; left/nationalist): success (SE)

   2000 – United States (Gore; conservative): success (SE)

   2000 – Ecuador (NSC; leftist): success: (CO)

   2001 – Afghanistan (Omar; rightist/Islamist): success (OF)

   2001 – Belarus (Lukashenko; leftist): failure (SE)

   2001 – Nicaragua (Ortega; Christian socialist): success (SE)

   2001 – Nepal (Birendra; nationalist/monarchist): success (CO)

   2002 – Venezuela (Chavez; reform-populist): failure (CO)

   2002 – Bolivia (Morales; leftist/MAS): success (SE)

   2002 – Brazil (Lula; center-left): failure (SE)

8. remember "The Move"! Philadelphia! Elliot Abrams IS a war criminal, listen to him! yeap….

9. Abrams said on camera Guaido's term doesn't start until Maduro "leaves". So, by his own war criminal reasoning, Guaido is not the interim in charge of anything today. Peace.

10. gtown?

11. The government of the United States is a lawless REGIME; they break every international law in the book but expect other countries to abide by the same laws they break. Can you imagine Russia, China or one of these other countries doing this, we wouldn't hear the end of it. Fake CNN and Fox news would be shouting this so loud you would be hearing it even if the television was switched off; but a convicted felon named Elliott Abrams that should be in jail dressed in an orange jumpsuit is allowed to wield this kind of power in the name of the American people.

12. Solidarity✊✊

13. It's about time,long past time the new rome stopped invading and annexing other countries.all those legions in those 1200 bases overseas should be brought home.

14. That whole building is the Embassy?

15. GOOD GOOD GOOD

16. The CIA has always been evil. Doing stuff like this since its beginning.

17. Code Pink! All the way!

18. SHUT UP YOU DEMOCRATS !

19. Finally some Americans with guts to stand up against the evil empire called United States.. which is only a corporation holding America hostage and concluding terroristic acts and behavior… Most of this fake government should be hung

20. HANDS OFF VENEZUELA
    NO WAR FOR OIL
    NO WAR FOR GOLD
    VENEZUELA IS A SOVEREIGN NATION
    NO MORE INNOCENT CIVILIANS DYING
    NO MORE BABIES DYING
    NO MORE WAR
    BRING OUR SOLDIERS HOME NOW
    HANDS OFF VENEZUELA
    HANDS OFF EVERYONE
    PEACE LOVE HAPPINESS RRR DAVID

21. Code pink suks dik

22. HANDS OFF VENEZUELA, corrupt MADURO

23. What parallel? Real news?

24. Hands off Venezuela

25. Fancy Elliot Abrams calling these good people "lawbreakers". Remember what he did to Central America in the 1980s? And Iraq more recently?

26. Spirit of Lawlessness. Exposed !!

27. SOME PEOPLE ARE SAYING THAT THEY SHOULD BURN THE BUILDING

28. o7

29. Solidarity to the people putting their bodies on the line to defend the revolution! Is there a way we can financially support them or make sure they have food and other necessities?

30. Where are the young people? Don't they care?

31. The US fascists will simply charge these brave people with terrorism and all protective laws are off the table.

32. Remember where the Aztecs pour Liquid Gold down the throat of Cortez? How about get a funnel and pour boiling oil down the throat of John Bolton and pompous Pompeo

33. If they did this in france the whole country would be behind them.

34. You see plenty of videos in the U.S of guys with beards holding military rifles and swearing that their patriotic.
    But it seems that little old ladies dressed in pink are far more patriotic than them.

35. Bless you all. Abrams lecturing about breaking the law 😂

36. Thank you for the American Activists for defending the rights of Venezuela and stopping their Gobernment from starting another War.
    GOD BLESS YOU!!!!!🌈

37. HOW FUNNY ALL THESE POOR IGNORANT ANIMALS SUPPORTING MADURO NARCO DICTATORSHIP //// THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW WHERE IS VENEZUELA ///// POOR PEOPLE WITHOUT ANY EDUCATION //// I HOPE THE US GOVERNMENT PUT EVERYONE OF THESE IGNORANTS IN JAIL /////

38. My respect for all those brave Americans defending the embassy. They are true heroes of democracy.

39. Well done guys

40. Code pink should win the Nobel peace prize

41. I am impressed, this is actually US people not buying the propaganda, capable of thinking and analyzing and standing up against their own government for what is right. Good work, keep it up!!!! Do not get to your knees in the face of the big OIL and warlords of the Zionist globalization.

42. Que Dios bendiga a estos luchadores que lo arriesgan todo por un país que no es el suyo eso es la verdadera ayuda humana muchas gracias por su apoyo como Venezolana les agradezco Que Dios los fortalezca y proteja

43. So … there’s are still some American people with a conscience – but I doubt that it is a big number.

44. Hoo RAY for JUSTICE TODAY–stand tall my brothers and sisters we are on our way to reveal their true face of death and destruction–just like their petroleum!

45. Notice, most f the activists are old retired!……….why is this? I think maybe it’s because everyone else know that they risk being on the fascist dissident list! Lots of people already know really what their government is all about but, prefer to keep getting their trickledown crumbs!😡👊🏾

46. This is not helpful in any way. It's just another example of fucked up american citizens as well as a fucked up administration of USA. Storm that embassy, throw out those hippies, lift the crippling sanctions against Venezuela, acknowledge Maduro as president and then open normal diplomatic and trade relations with that country. And throw a few of those occupants in a humane jail for a couple of months. But frankly i believe this "code pink" are CIA Stooges.

47. This Beast time to be judged is near ! They Will win and think they Will be safe but time of sorrow Will Come instantly

48. They have white people singing negro spirituals. smh let's worry about America first

49. The U.S. is a 🍌 republic.

50. i'm glad that these people are trying but they are so small it just goes to show that their are most americans that don't care and it will it will be too late for them and when other countries start to close their door its all over for america countries that are with america will leave as soon once the red flag is u p and they do the same

Comments are closed.